|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:26:19 GMT -5
I see a whole lot of posts due to Jeremy's posts True. We usually get about 5 posts complaining about how stupid Jeremys 1 post was. Well have to figure out another way to get those 5 posts.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:26:57 GMT -5
Another problem with Jeremy is that he's hard headed. If you have people trying to help you and you continue to do the same thing over and over to the point of annoying everyone including the person helping you, what's the point of giving you shot after shot? Its because it isnt his fault. Its circumstance. Its the other guy. Its a one time thing. Always an excuse.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:28:16 GMT -5
I currently have -1 PMs. That cant be good.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Jul 29, 2007 16:28:50 GMT -5
Spence, for someone who likes activity as much as you do I think it's pretty stupid to let Jeremy walk. Maybe at first glance. But over the last week Ive actually come to the conclusion that Jeremy may prevent others from being more active. Even if he doesn't, he is a negative for many people that are actually GMs in the league, so why keep someone here who is a drawback for some? Just doesn't make sense. If Jeremy could be active, without being annoying, it'd be win-win, but I don't see that ever happening. I'm sure Jeremy will just attribute all of this to unfair treatment which is why he wont change. IMO, I think thats far from the truth as can be. Everytime he says something dumb, which is a lot everyone gangs up and makes their issues with him known. I mean seriously compare the amounts of posts of Jeremy written articles to non-Jeremy written articles. If Jeremy is some type of drawback for a GM then fucking ignore him don't read his shit and don't respond to it. It is not like Jeremy's asinine comments are preventing other GM's from doing their jobs.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:30:43 GMT -5
Maybe at first glance. But over the last week Ive actually come to the conclusion that Jeremy may prevent others from being more active. Even if he doesn't, he is a negative for many people that are actually GMs in the league, so why keep someone here who is a drawback for some? Just doesn't make sense. If Jeremy could be active, without being annoying, it'd be win-win, but I don't see that ever happening. I'm sure Jeremy will just attribute all of this to unfair treatment which is why he wont change. IMO, I think thats far from the truth as can be. Everytime he says something dumb, which is a lot everyone gangs up and makes their issues with him known. I mean seriously compare the amounts of posts of Jeremy written articles to non-Jeremy written articles. If Jeremy is some type of drawback for a GM then fucking ignore him don't read his shit and don't respond to it. It is not like Jeremy's asinine comments are preventing other GM's from doing their jobs. I wish I agreed with you, but I'm about as from from your view as can be. I very much think Jeremy is a huge negative for the league, and I'm pretty happy he's gone. I don't think activity will be hurt by his absence.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:33:21 GMT -5
If activity does drop, and the BBS ends, it'll probably be Jeremy's computers fault.
|
|
|
Post by garf2000 on Jul 29, 2007 16:35:33 GMT -5
Listen... I'm sick of seeing Jeremy's stupid articles and his deleted posts and antics, but he occasionally does have something decent to contribute.
I propose:
1) Jeremy is on probation for the next week. 2) It is up to HIM, to decide what he can and cannot do. If he posts, they sure as hell better be meaningful. If he writes an article, it better be entertaining and informative.
If after a week, he continues to act like a child, he's gone. If he proves he's learned, he stays for another week, and same stipulations. Make him EARN his spot here.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Jul 29, 2007 16:36:17 GMT -5
it's actually quite hard to ignore his posts when he posts anywhere and everywhere, but whatever.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:37:05 GMT -5
Listen... I'm sick of seeing Jeremy's stupid articles and his deleted posts and antics, but he occasionally does have something decent to contribute. I propose: 1) Jeremy is on probation for the next week. 2) It is up to HIM, to decide what he can and cannot do. If he posts, they sure as hell better be meaningful. If he writes an article, it better be entertaining and informative. If after a week, he continues to act like a child, he's gone. If he proves he's learned, he stays for another week, and same stipulations. Make him EARN his spot here. I was all for giving him a chance already. It took him less then 6 hours to fuck it up. Why should we give him another chance? Ive talked to him many times. I know others have as well, and he hasn't changed. Another week is gonna make a difference?
|
|
|
Post by bossplaya on Jul 29, 2007 16:38:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:38:32 GMT -5
it's actually quite hard to ignore his posts when he posts anywhere and everywhere, but whatever. True, and why should the actual GMs of this league need to ignore the rantings of a non-GM?
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Jul 29, 2007 16:39:13 GMT -5
I do admit that Jeremy's posts are dumb as shit but you have to realize as sad as it is this is what Jeremy's social life really boils down to in a nutshell.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:41:24 GMT -5
I do admit that Jeremy's posts are dumb as shit but you have to realize as sad as it is this is what Jeremy's social life really boils down to in a nutshell. I will not be held responsible for what Jeremy does with his free time. We gave him a shot here. He didn't cut it. I feel bad for Jeremy too, but i spend way too much of my free time on BBS to have some make it a negative experience for me.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Jul 29, 2007 16:51:50 GMT -5
What did Jeremy do that was so bad? His commenting on everything was a bit annoying but I just tended to ignore it. He has damn near 3,000 posts which is more than Keelty, Manas, and Rommie combined. I really don't get how he was negative? or how does he prevent GM's from being active?
|
|
|
Post by garf2000 on Jul 29, 2007 16:51:56 GMT -5
Listen... I'm sick of seeing Jeremy's stupid articles and his deleted posts and antics, but he occasionally does have something decent to contribute. I propose: 1) Jeremy is on probation for the next week. 2) It is up to HIM, to decide what he can and cannot do. If he posts, they sure as hell better be meaningful. If he writes an article, it better be entertaining and informative. If after a week, he continues to act like a child, he's gone. If he proves he's learned, he stays for another week, and same stipulations. Make him EARN his spot here. I was all for giving him a chance already. It took him less then 6 hours to fuck it up. Why should we give him another chance? Ive talked to him many times. I know others have as well, and he hasn't changed. Another week is gonna make a difference? Just give him this one final shot... if he fucks up, no one can say he was fired/banned unfairly. If he stays, it means he's done a good job.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:54:35 GMT -5
What did Jeremy do that was so bad? His commenting on everything was a bit annoying but I just tended to ignore it. He has damn near 3,000 posts which is more than Keelty, Manas, and Rommie combined. I really don't get how he was negative? or how does he prevent GM's from being active? Re-read all my posts in this thread. If you still don't understand my point, then I guess we disagree.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Jul 29, 2007 16:55:04 GMT -5
What did Jeremy do that was so bad? His commenting on everything was a bit annoying but I just tended to ignore it. He has damn near 3,000 posts which is more than Keelty, Manas, and Rommie combined. I really don't get how he was negative? or how does he prevent GM's from being active? I dont understand how he prevent's GM's from being active I would like to hear the theory behind that one too.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:55:28 GMT -5
I was all for giving him a chance already. It took him less then 6 hours to fuck it up. Why should we give him another chance? Ive talked to him many times. I know others have as well, and he hasn't changed. Another week is gonna make a difference? Just give him this one final shot... if he fucks up, no one can say he was fired/banned unfairly. If he stays, it means he's done a good job. I don't think it was unfair.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Jul 29, 2007 16:56:55 GMT -5
What did Jeremy do that was so bad? His commenting on everything was a bit annoying but I just tended to ignore it. He has damn near 3,000 posts which is more than Keelty, Manas, and Rommie combined. I really don't get how he was negative? or how does he prevent GM's from being active? Re-read all my posts in this thread. If you still don't understand my point, then I guess we disagree. I have read all your posts. I think you are acting pretty harshly
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:57:28 GMT -5
I often get so frustrated about something stupid Jeremy has done, that Ill sign off the boards and go watch TV, or surf some other site online, and it's my league. I know people are frustrated by what he does and says, and I have gotten to the point that feel as though his presence is negative for other GMs. When GMs feel negative, they aren't positive, and therefore they don't want to spend as much time on the boards.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 16:59:06 GMT -5
Re-read all my posts in this thread. If you still don't understand my point, then I guess we disagree. I have read all your posts. I think you are acting pretty harshly I feel as though I need to be more harsh, because every time I turn around someones trying to loophole out of shit. I have no sympathy for Jeremy plight. He had a simple set of instructions to follow, and he couldn't. Instead of saying I acted unfairly, IM Jeremy and ask him why he didn't follow my set of instructions.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Jul 29, 2007 16:59:32 GMT -5
i find it pretty funny/shocking that people here are seriously trying get him back in when in fact these very people have been bashed on by* jeremy on AIM many-a-time.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Jul 29, 2007 16:59:52 GMT -5
I often get so frustrated about something stupid Jeremy has done, that Ill sign off the boards and go watch TV, or surf some other site online, and it's my league. I know people are frustrated by what he does and says, and I have gotten to the point that feel as though his presence is negative for other GMs. When GMs feel negative, they aren't positive, and therefore they don't want to spend as much time on the boards. I think you need to take after castro and start smoking some cigars maybe to help you relax
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 17:00:52 GMT -5
i find it pretty funny/shocking that people here are seriously trying get him back in when in fact these very people have been bashed on jeremy on AIM many-a-time. People just want to argue. They want to question the things I decide on. Its one of the more annoying parts of the sim. All the people defending Jeremy have suddenly gotten soft, because they have all said to me how much Jeremy annoys the fuck out of them. Its quite gay.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 17:01:30 GMT -5
I often get so frustrated about something stupid Jeremy has done, that Ill sign off the boards and go watch TV, or surf some other site online, and it's my league. I know people are frustrated by what he does and says, and I have gotten to the point that feel as though his presence is negative for other GMs. When GMs feel negative, they aren't positive, and therefore they don't want to spend as much time on the boards. I think you need to take after castro and start smoking some cigars maybe to help you relax I think you need to pick a side.
|
|