|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 12, 2006 19:07:32 GMT -5
Hornets trade: All available 1st round picks up until 2018(If he can not own one of the picks due to a limit, give him the next available 1st.)
Bulls trade: The two draft picks of this years draft
Stipulation: If none of the picks I trade him land in the Top 5 in the time-span till 2018(or whichever year is the last 1st rounder), I owe him 3 more picks.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 12, 2006 19:08:51 GMT -5
I've never had any luck in the draft(so yeah I'm taking a huge risk with this deal anyways) but I love this draft. And I've always built my team through Free Agency anyways, so it doesn't bother me. If I can surround Nowitzki with some more talent, I should be solid.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Dec 12, 2006 19:09:28 GMT -5
this is suppose to total 14 firsts to be given to me....if none of those 14 land top 5 then he owes me three more....I just wanted to clarify that.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Dec 12, 2006 19:13:05 GMT -5
the hornets have no picks for 18 years after this deal..............
|
|
|
Post by garf2000 on Dec 12, 2006 19:21:11 GMT -5
jesus
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Dec 12, 2006 19:22:38 GMT -5
this is fucking dumb.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 12, 2006 19:29:55 GMT -5
were u the one offering him 13?
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Dec 12, 2006 19:36:21 GMT -5
I wuoldnt offer more than 3.
|
|
|
Post by manasrai on Dec 12, 2006 20:05:50 GMT -5
woo wee! definately can't argue with this deal in the long run for the Bulls.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 12, 2006 20:09:22 GMT -5
All the picks are owned by me. I have a solid team for the next 3-4 seasons with the players I have. Tack on two players the caliber of AK, Brand, Marion, Terry etc on top of Nowitzki. I'm good for the next 7-8 seasons. That's when Free Agency will be good, I'm not worried.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Dec 12, 2006 20:13:31 GMT -5
were u the one offering him 13?
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Dec 12, 2006 20:18:06 GMT -5
the 1 and 7th projected pics for 14 picks, I mean it would of been less dumb if you waited till after lotto to see if you were gonna end up with AK Marion or Brand but what happens if you get like Rip and Miller is gonna be worth it then?
|
|
|
Post by Bender on Dec 12, 2006 20:25:15 GMT -5
wow thats a lot of picks
|
|
|
Post by Bender on Dec 12, 2006 20:28:49 GMT -5
i offered him 13 picks
|
|
|
Post by Bender on Dec 12, 2006 20:29:56 GMT -5
ha ha no i didnt fuck that this deal sucks. the ping pong balls r gonna show number 1 pick will be the milwaukee bucks. it was in my fortune cookie
|
|
|
Post by duce on Dec 12, 2006 20:46:43 GMT -5
i mean i don't even care, to each his own but im 100% sure he could have given up less picks and still gotten what he wanted. but hey, whatever.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 12, 2006 20:49:54 GMT -5
the 1 and 7th projected pics for 14 picks, I mean it would of been less dumb if you waited till after lotto to see if you were gonna end up with AK Marion or Brand but what happens if you get like Rip and Miller is gonna be worth it then? Sure but if the picks landed #1 and #7 I don't think he'd deal them. Besides people are acting like I don't have the players to trade for more picks or like Free Agency won't be active in like 3-4 seasons from now.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Dec 12, 2006 20:58:11 GMT -5
the 1 and 7th projected pics for 14 picks, I mean it would of been less dumb if you waited till after lotto to see if you were gonna end up with AK Marion or Brand but what happens if you get like Rip and Miller is gonna be worth it then? Sure but if the picks landed #1 and #7 I don't think he'd deal them. Besides people are acting like I don't have the players to trade for more picks or like Free Agency won't be active in like 3-4 seasons from now. There is not much someone wouldn't trade for 14 picks.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 12, 2006 21:01:19 GMT -5
Im not gonna process this. Its a completely unrealistic trade. Ive pretty much not let guys trade more then 5 or 6 picks into the future, no way I allow one team to trade 14 future 1sts.
|
|
|
Post by Bender on Dec 12, 2006 21:04:06 GMT -5
oh come on spence let's set the precedent and if u think its not realistic isiah thomas would def do this but instead of the number 1 pick it would be for chris webber
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Dec 12, 2006 21:06:56 GMT -5
hahaha....i pretty much knew this deal wouldn't fly but damnnnnnnn 14 picks...with potential of it being 17...wooo weeee
|
|
|
Post by garf2000 on Dec 12, 2006 21:08:53 GMT -5
Im not gonna process this. Its a completely unrealistic trade. Ive pretty much not let guys trade more then 5 or 6 picks into the future, no way I allow one team to trade 14 future 1sts. since the lumley trade, trading what, every pick until 2049?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 12, 2006 21:09:06 GMT -5
Behind the scenes I have limited the trading of future picks, with a deal like this I have to step up and stop it. Ill give Chris and Dave some reasons....
-It sets a bad precedent. We restarted to stop all of the loopholes, this creates a huge loophole. It allows people to trade picks without regard to their future.
-Its a bad deal. Its a very lopsided deal that had the potential of being vetoed.
-Its very unrealistic in a league where we want to strive for some amount of realism.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 12, 2006 21:09:50 GMT -5
Im not gonna process this. Its a completely unrealistic trade. Ive pretty much not let guys trade more then 5 or 6 picks into the future, no way I allow one team to trade 14 future 1sts. since the lumley trade, trading what, every pick until 2049? I dont understand what youre saying.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 12, 2006 21:10:07 GMT -5
hahaha....i pretty much knew this deal wouldn't fly but damnnnnnnn 14 picks...with potential of it being 17...wooo weeee Im glad you understand.
|
|