|
Post by garf2000 on Dec 12, 2006 21:45:39 GMT -5
since the lumley trade, trading what, every pick until 2049? I dont understand what youre saying. didnt lumley trade all his picks for like 20 years to nate in a deal?
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 12, 2006 21:49:40 GMT -5
I'm tanking.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Dec 12, 2006 22:28:58 GMT -5
I dont understand what youre saying. didnt lumley trade all his picks for like 20 years to nate in a deal? yeah old bbs. like all 2030s.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Dec 12, 2006 22:52:21 GMT -5
thank you dan
|
|
|
Post by GP on Dec 13, 2006 3:16:43 GMT -5
wow 18 years...thats a fucking long time, and alot of picks...i think lumley did do it one time...then again what has lumley not done in bbs?
|
|
|
Post by Lumley316 on Dec 13, 2006 4:44:32 GMT -5
It was like 11 1sts for like 3 lottery picks. I dealt alot of my 1sts in different deals lol. Plus the real reason I did it bcoz I new the league wouldnt last that long lol.
|
|
|
Post by aigatdula on Dec 13, 2006 5:31:50 GMT -5
hate to say it but this kind of deal would definately kill realism... If any of the NBA GM deals even more than 4 1st in a deal, i think he'd lose his job... my point is, its really unrealistic... sorry..
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Dec 13, 2006 12:31:15 GMT -5
It was like 11 1sts for like 3 lottery picks. I dealt alot of my 1sts in different deals lol. Plus the real reason I did it bcoz I new the league wouldnt last that long lol. Good call. It lasted like 5 years.
|
|
|
Post by Lumley316 on Dec 13, 2006 15:11:18 GMT -5
We never got to the 2030s lol and dare I say it the 2024 season lol.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 13, 2006 16:37:59 GMT -5
hate to say it but this kind of deal would definately kill realism... If any of the NBA GM deals even more than 4 1st in a deal, i think he'd lose his job... my point is, its really unrealistic... sorry.. Right and constantly dealing of stars is extremely realistic... thanks.
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Dec 13, 2006 16:55:01 GMT -5
hate to say it but this kind of deal would definately kill realism... If any of the NBA GM deals even more than 4 1st in a deal, i think he'd lose his job... my point is, its really unrealistic... sorry.. Right and constantly dealing of stars is extremely realistic... thanks. More realistic than trading 20 1sts, please...
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 13, 2006 18:09:09 GMT -5
Right and constantly dealing of stars is extremely realistic... thanks. More realistic than trading 20 1sts, please... U.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 14, 2006 19:52:25 GMT -5
good deal.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 14, 2006 19:52:56 GMT -5
VOID!
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 14, 2006 19:53:18 GMT -5
seriously why?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 14, 2006 19:53:55 GMT -5
Behind the scenes I have limited the trading of future picks, with a deal like this I have to step up and stop it. Ill give Chris and Dave some reasons.... -It sets a bad precedent. We restarted to stop all of the loopholes, this creates a huge loophole. It allows people to trade picks without regard to their future. -Its a bad deal. Its a very lopsided deal that had the potential of being vetoed. -Its very unrealistic in a league where we want to strive for some amount of realism.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 14, 2006 19:56:43 GMT -5
Behind the scenes I have limited the trading of future picks, with a deal like this I have to step up and stop it. Ill give Chris and Dave some reasons.... -It sets a bad precedent. We restarted to stop all of the loopholes, this creates a huge loophole. It allows people to trade picks without regard to their future. -Its a bad deal. Its a very lopsided deal that had the potential of being vetoed. -Its very unrealistic in a league where we want to strive for some amount of realism. #3 is the only reasonable reason. With that being said. My team from this year is in-tact. Dirk is 20... I bring in Brand and maybe Andre or Terry either 3 in 20s. I have 3 legitimate pieces for my future... for a good 7-8 maybe 10 seasons from now +... and I have the sufficient amount of pieces to deal for picks if I wanted to. I never built a playoff team based on drafts... ALL of my playoff teams have been via trades or Free Agency you know that... it's not that I don't like the draft, I love it, it's the easiest way to build a team... but my luck in it is terrible.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 14, 2006 19:58:53 GMT -5
Void.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 14, 2006 20:00:35 GMT -5
now i truly have no future thanks... this team is going to be good meaning my picks are going to suck...unless I go through another loophole of dealing all my stars for picks... and having crap players on my team i.e. "tanking"
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 14, 2006 20:03:59 GMT -5
now i truly have no future thanks... this team is going to be good meaning my picks are going to suck...unless I go through another loophole of dealing all my stars for picks... and having crap players on my team i.e. "tanking" How does your teams future have anything to do with this deal? You have a future stud in Dirk. You can either ride this team until MJ and Pip retire, or you can deal them for youth. Its not liek this at all inhibits your future.
|
|