|
Post by The X-Factor on Jul 17, 2007 10:30:21 GMT -5
Darrell Arthur 6'9 230lbs 20 Junior College: Kansas Strengths: A big PF with big time hops. Antonio McDyess pre-knee injury anyone? Mid-Range game is above-average. Can run up and down the court. Post game seems to be getting better and better. Weaknesses:Gets into foul trouble often by constantly attempting blocks. Still needs to put on more strength. although mid-range game is solid, still needs much improvement. Likes to take players off the dribble, but his handling ability is sub-par. Needs to box out more. Notes: This guy is a monster on the offensive end and the chances of him coming out this year are 50/50. Has improved his rebounding ability. Potential Rookie Ratings: B C+ C C+ B- A
|
|
|
Post by duce on Jul 17, 2007 12:18:31 GMT -5
nice
|
|
|
Post by Vernon on Jul 24, 2007 16:30:40 GMT -5
Not bad.
|
|
|
Post by JDawg on Jul 24, 2007 17:05:45 GMT -5
He's injured in UOSL, LMAO, that was too funny.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 26, 2007 12:21:02 GMT -5
Very solid prospect. I remember I had Darrell Arthur and Brandan Wright when I first entered NBN.
|
|
|
Post by nova on Jul 26, 2007 13:27:54 GMT -5
Julian Wright...when will his profile be up you guys think?
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Jul 26, 2007 14:42:23 GMT -5
He's injured in UOSL, LMAO, that was too funny. It really isn't though.
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Jul 26, 2007 14:46:39 GMT -5
He's injured in UOSL, LMAO, that was too funny. It really isn't though. not really sure what Jeremy was thinking here
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Aug 21, 2007 21:34:24 GMT -5
updated.
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Aug 21, 2007 22:21:33 GMT -5
come on man
B C+ C C+ B- A for an ok player?
jeez, B- C C B- C+ A would be more realistic.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Aug 22, 2007 9:56:31 GMT -5
Darrell Arthur is an "OK" player? Do you watch college basketball at all?
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Aug 22, 2007 14:46:02 GMT -5
Darrell Arthur is an "OK" player? Do you watch college basketball at all? I'm just saying, with those ratings he'll be a top 3 pick. IMO, he'll go around 5-10... B- C C B- C+ A, do it.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Aug 22, 2007 22:04:04 GMT -5
he's going to be a top 3 pick in the NBA.
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Aug 22, 2007 22:16:16 GMT -5
he's going to be a top 3 pick in the NBA. I'll put 50 on it.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Aug 22, 2007 23:58:05 GMT -5
I gave Oden a B inside and you flipped out.
You mean to tell me Arthur and Oden have the same offensive ability, fuck outta here.
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Aug 23, 2007 15:13:38 GMT -5
I gave Oden a B inside and you flipped out. You mean to tell me Arthur and Oden have the same offensive ability, fuck outta here. Shut the fuck up, dumbass. You guys had Oden at like B D+ D+ A- B A which is ungodly. I just said to tone it down and go with like B- D+ D+ B+ B A because eventually he'd end up A- D+ C- A+ A- which is what he should be. Are you and idiot or are you an idiot?
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Aug 23, 2007 17:06:44 GMT -5
Let me ask the question again just in case you didn't catch it the first time.
Arthur has a much better offensive game than Oden, so why should he also get a B- in that category, "dumbass."
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Aug 23, 2007 22:15:36 GMT -5
Let me ask the question again just in case you didn't catch it the first time. Arthur has a much better offensive game than Oden, so why should he also get a B- in that category, "dumbass." because Oden strength > Arthur's Oden hops > Arthur's Arthur inside scoring > Oden's 2 > 1. Oden wins. now STFU
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Aug 23, 2007 22:47:48 GMT -5
Oden has more hops than Arthur? Ok my arguing with you is done.
|
|
|
Post by Lumley316 on Aug 24, 2007 2:39:54 GMT -5
Well per college stats Oden was a better efficient scorer.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Aug 25, 2007 17:39:13 GMT -5
Well per college stats Oden was a better efficient scorer. Kansas had more offensive weapons though and you can't compare a 7'0" plus monster to a 6'9 PF
|
|