|
Post by duce on Oct 24, 2007 22:31:05 GMT -5
I say keep it. Easier for lazy Duce.
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Oct 24, 2007 22:45:17 GMT -5
i dont really care about the names but i would like to see real names down the line because after awhile the game created names get boring
|
|
|
Post by duce on Oct 24, 2007 22:51:07 GMT -5
i dont really care about the names but i would like to see real names down the line because after awhile the game created names get boring If they're real names, it won't match the real abilities at all. The other thing is I'm not closed minded to real drafts, I just don't know how to do it. I don't think it would be a problem to hold the real-life 2004 draft in 2005, 05 in 06, etc etc. But I'd need help. The only reason we'd change these players to real life names is to make the league seem at least more real I think.
|
|
|
Post by CardinalsGM on Oct 24, 2007 22:53:09 GMT -5
I say (as long as it's not a huge problem) that we just follow the draft a year after with real players. I know a couple of the other GMs have experience doing drafts and importing real players, but I don't know how much of a pain it is.
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Oct 24, 2007 23:08:51 GMT -5
i dont really care if abilites are the same since its that way with most of the prospects that are in game now
|
|
|
Post by GP on Oct 24, 2007 23:30:38 GMT -5
went with real
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 25, 2007 0:19:46 GMT -5
Id like to see real drafts used, but i that doesn't work, I don't mind fictional. No players will progress like they really did anyway, so it doesn't matter to me.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Oct 25, 2007 1:08:28 GMT -5
I would like to see real as well, but Im fine with fake players as well. It just sucks that down the line the league will be all fictional players, it takes some of the fun aspect out of it IMO.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Oct 25, 2007 6:00:04 GMT -5
Real with random ass abilities...
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevils on Oct 25, 2007 20:37:14 GMT -5
Keep the fictional names for this year... but we could consider real names for top 'spects in the future.
|
|
|
Post by stinie3 on Oct 25, 2007 20:52:34 GMT -5
I would say since we started, leave as is this year. But I would like to see real prospects imported into the drafts. I hate fictional players.
|
|
manny27
Backup
Kansas City Royals
Posts: 195
|
Post by manny27 on Oct 26, 2007 1:21:57 GMT -5
we could just add like 10-20 of the common guys then just go with fictional
|
|
Nanz
Starter
Arizona Diamondbacks
Posts: 1,296
|
Post by Nanz on Oct 26, 2007 1:30:26 GMT -5
I think we should keep the fictional names for this year and then start next year with real players. I dk maybe its just becuase i love my guy's name, David " Hack: Sok, whoever though of that is a genious.
|
|
|
Post by play34basketball on Oct 26, 2007 1:37:36 GMT -5
we could just add like 10-20 of the common guys then just go with fictional I like this idea but we should go with whatever is easier for Duce. I dont mind the fictional players.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Oct 26, 2007 9:35:08 GMT -5
OR SOMEONE COULD DO THIS FOR DUCE TO MAKE HIS LIFE EASIER AND THIS LEAGUE BETTER
|
|
|
Post by duce on Oct 26, 2007 12:55:22 GMT -5
capital letters, interesting.
|
|
Nanz
Starter
Arizona Diamondbacks
Posts: 1,296
|
Post by Nanz on Oct 26, 2007 14:57:04 GMT -5
capital letters, interesting. i think that means hes volunteering to help you!
|
|
|
Post by duce on Oct 26, 2007 15:43:27 GMT -5
capital letters, interesting. i think that means hes volunteering to help you! na, it means he's at work...
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 26, 2007 15:44:02 GMT -5
i think that means hes volunteering to help you! na, it means he's at work... LOL, true.
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevils on Dec 1, 2007 0:59:02 GMT -5
Are we gonna do real names next year? I guess it's up to Mike, but I'm just posing the possibility to him.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Dec 1, 2007 1:02:53 GMT -5
Are we gonna do real names next year? I guess it's up to Mike, but I'm just posing the possibility to him. It's 8 rounds. Mike will be in his first year. I just don't think it's a fair idea to throw at him.
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevils on Dec 1, 2007 1:06:03 GMT -5
I completely understand if he doesn't want to do it, was just throwing out the idea.
|
|