|
Post by Spencer on Oct 4, 2007 21:28:09 GMT -5
I expected one of the 3 Contract year guys to be gone, which would've opened a spot for Chris. Because this didn't happen, I'm gonna leave the Gm situation as is for now.
Chris is the SAC GM.
Lums is the Asst.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Oct 4, 2007 21:30:47 GMT -5
Is the roster in better shape? No.
Stick to your word, Spence. Chris doesn't belong in the league over Lumley. Fire Hype if you have to, but it's ridiculous that Lum's not in BBS.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 4, 2007 21:31:20 GMT -5
Is the roster in better shape? No. Stick to your word, Spence. Chris doesn't belong in the league over Lumley. Fire Hype if you have to, but it's ridiculous that Lum's not in BBS. This was a pretty easy decision for me, so Im not worried.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Oct 4, 2007 21:33:25 GMT -5
Is the roster in better shape? No. Stick to your word, Spence. Chris doesn't belong in the league over Lumley. Fire Hype if you have to, but it's ridiculous that Lum's not in BBS. This was a pretty easy decision for me, so Im not worried. But you're not being fair! At least provide a way for Lumley to regain a team, like you originally did.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 4, 2007 21:34:06 GMT -5
Lumley will get his team back. Chris is just saving his spot.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Oct 4, 2007 21:34:36 GMT -5
OK, good.
|
|
|
Post by James on Oct 4, 2007 22:00:27 GMT -5
What happens to Chris when Lums gets Sac back?
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Oct 4, 2007 22:18:54 GMT -5
Is the roster in better shape? No. Stick to your word, Spence. Chris doesn't belong in the league over Lumley. Fire Hype if you have to, but it's ridiculous that Lum's not in BBS. I made the playoffs you fucking moron, have Roy, JR Smith, and Louis Williams... a ton of cap room and both my picks the next two seasons. STFU and be gone pest.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Oct 4, 2007 22:28:32 GMT -5
Is the roster in better shape? No. Stick to your word, Spence. Chris doesn't belong in the league over Lumley. Fire Hype if you have to, but it's ridiculous that Lum's not in BBS. I made the playoffs you fucking moron, have Roy, JR Smith, and Louis Williams... a ton of cap room and both my picks the next two seasons. STFU and be gone pest. Hahaha, you have nothing, you made the playoffs with a team that would've won 46+ if you hadn't messed it up, and making the playoffs had nothing to do with whether or not Lumley was coming back.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Oct 4, 2007 22:31:58 GMT -5
Right, 46... brilliant.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Oct 4, 2007 23:04:31 GMT -5
You go a little overboard on your team. You won 40 games in the West, it's really not that good. I joke about my team being amazing, but 40 wins is pretty weak. I think you would have won more games having not dealt LeBron, so I don't think you can throw your record out there. In the end, the future of the team was better with LeBron, IMO. The situation is nothing to constantly mention.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Oct 4, 2007 23:34:09 GMT -5
You go a little overboard on your team. You won 40 games in the West, it's really not that good. I joke about my team being amazing, but 40 wins is pretty weak. I think you would have won more games having not dealt LeBron, so I don't think you can throw your record out there. In the end, the future of the team was better with LeBron, IMO. The situation is nothing to constantly mention. How is saying that this team is better than before going overboard? No, my team was not better with LeBron. I'd be over the hard cap, stuck with players like Boozer, Ilgauskas, Webber, Stojakovic, etc who are all old and with no picks. That team with Lebron didn't even make playoffs, in the West. I made the playoffs in the West without LeBron. Simple as that.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Oct 4, 2007 23:37:51 GMT -5
You go a little overboard on your team. You won 40 games in the West, it's really not that good. I joke about my team being amazing, but 40 wins is pretty weak. I think you would have won more games having not dealt LeBron, so I don't think you can throw your record out there. In the end, the future of the team was better with LeBron, IMO. The situation is nothing to constantly mention. How is saying that this team is better than before going overboard? No, my team was not better with LeBron. I'd be over the hard cap, stuck with players like Boozer, Ilgauskas, Webber, Stojakovic, etc who are all old and with no picks. That team with Lebron didn't even make playoffs, in the West. I made the playoffs in the West without LeBron. Simple as that. Boozer, Z, LeBron, Peja could've done a bit of damage in the West. Don't pretend LeBron didn't turn into a top 3 player last TC. You blew it!
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Oct 4, 2007 23:39:10 GMT -5
How is saying that this team is better than before going overboard? No, my team was not better with LeBron. I'd be over the hard cap, stuck with players like Boozer, Ilgauskas, Webber, Stojakovic, etc who are all old and with no picks. That team with Lebron didn't even make playoffs, in the West. I made the playoffs in the West without LeBron. Simple as that. Boozer, Z, LeBron, Peja could've done a bit of damage in the West. Don't pretend LeBron didn't turn into a top 3 player last TC. You blew it! I'm done with you, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Oct 4, 2007 23:41:04 GMT -5
Boozer, Z, LeBron, Peja could've done a bit of damage in the West. Don't pretend LeBron didn't turn into a top 3 player last TC. You blew it! I'm done with you, thanks. Don't you want to call me a The Champ or something?
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Oct 4, 2007 23:41:20 GMT -5
No, right, you're the bigger man here. I forgot.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Oct 5, 2007 1:05:14 GMT -5
you wouldnt have webber and boozer! i would have one of them! so ha!
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Oct 5, 2007 5:28:45 GMT -5
is martinez in front of me when lumley gets sac back?
bah, i hope not
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Oct 5, 2007 9:20:40 GMT -5
is martinez in front of me when lumley gets sac back? bah, i hope not yes
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on Oct 5, 2007 9:24:45 GMT -5
Well, for what it's worth I think Lums should get next open team if he wants it. Chris has kinda already put his stamp on it and likes the direction it's going so let him continue to build Sac.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 5, 2007 12:23:51 GMT -5
Well, for what it's worth I think Lums should get next open team if he wants it. Chris has kinda already put his stamp on it and likes the direction it's going so let him continue to build Sac. I talked to Lumley already, and he said he wanted Sacramento back.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Oct 5, 2007 12:31:29 GMT -5
I'd like atleast 3 seasons.. but that's fine I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 5, 2007 12:36:28 GMT -5
I'd like atleast 3 seasons.. but that's fine I guess. Initially is was 1 season for you in Sacto and then you moved to the open team. I'm gonna move you to the next open team, but whenever that is Im not sure.
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on Oct 5, 2007 13:06:38 GMT -5
Well, for what it's worth I think Lums should get next open team if he wants it. Chris has kinda already put his stamp on it and likes the direction it's going so let him continue to build Sac. I talked to Lumley already, and he said he wanted Sacramento back. Ah ok, I didnt know that.
|
|
|
Post by Lumley316 on Oct 5, 2007 13:12:56 GMT -5
Hey if he gets a 3rd year I should just move to another team after Skillz gets a open team.
|
|