|
Post by aigatdula on Jun 13, 2007 8:50:08 GMT -5
agreed with this... gives the team to go field in a winning team...
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Jun 13, 2007 9:34:20 GMT -5
with the team i have set up if i cant be successful someone else deserves a shot someone write this downq
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Jun 13, 2007 9:36:37 GMT -5
with the team i have set up if i cant be successful someone else deserves a shot someone write this downq ok van wilder
|
|
|
Post by d2acollectables on Jun 13, 2007 18:39:48 GMT -5
oh so the days have passed in the old bbs when the buck would win 55-60 every year.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Jun 13, 2007 20:17:29 GMT -5
I think 3 years would be more challenging than 4....or up the wins to 45
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Jun 13, 2007 21:19:56 GMT -5
I think 3 years would be more challenging than 4....or up the wins to 45 Agreed, since I'm out of here anyway, it doesn't really matter... See you guys
|
|
|
Post by Lumley316 on Jun 13, 2007 23:40:23 GMT -5
LOL thanks for sticking up for me guys, I now that Chris is messing around he wants me to get pissed off. Ducky your team is due for a great TC so its very possible for you to win this season. Plus your in the West.
|
|
|
Post by garf2000 on Jun 25, 2007 13:14:34 GMT -5
This is a new feature of the BBS and the Direction Board. If you have 4 years of sub 40 win seasons you will enter your contract year. In you contract year you must win 40 games, or make the playoffs. If you do not succeed you will be replaced. I hope that most people can succeed in this, and would return to BBS when an opening comes up. So exactly who is this currently affecting?
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Jun 25, 2007 13:15:03 GMT -5
This is a new feature of the BBS and the Direction Board. If you have 4 years of sub 40 win seasons you will enter your contract year. In you contract year you must win 40 games, or make the playoffs. If you do not succeed you will be replaced. I hope that most people can succeed in this, and would return to BBS when an opening comes up. So exactly who is this currently affecting? I believe only Scott and ducky
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 25, 2007 13:19:53 GMT -5
D2A. Bender.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Jun 25, 2007 13:24:16 GMT -5
Bender had 40 wins in 04
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 25, 2007 13:25:27 GMT -5
Hes never had more then 42 wins I believe, so his mediocrity put him in his contract year.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Jun 25, 2007 13:32:32 GMT -5
Hes never had more then 42 wins I believe, so his mediocrity put him in his contract year. product of environment... put him in atlantic, midwest, pacific things would easily be different
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Jun 25, 2007 13:34:16 GMT -5
We should make playoffs, as long as no one gets injured...
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 25, 2007 13:34:33 GMT -5
Hes never had more then 42 wins I believe, so his mediocrity put him in his contract year. product of environment... put him in atlantic, midwest, pacific things would easily be different He still needs to win this year.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Jun 25, 2007 13:41:50 GMT -5
product of environment... put him in atlantic, midwest, pacific things would easily be different He still needs to win this year. well he's stated that himself...playoffs or bust
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 25, 2007 13:49:32 GMT -5
He still needs to win this year. well he's stated that himself...playoffs or bust I told him he needs to win this year. Its in his teams thread. Thats why he says its playoffs or bust.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Jun 25, 2007 14:42:43 GMT -5
Well I don't see how you get on Bender who has had a pretty good team throughout and fail to mention KG...
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 25, 2007 14:53:10 GMT -5
KG was dominant the first 3 years. Bender has been mediocre every year.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Jun 25, 2007 14:59:54 GMT -5
KG was dominant the first 3 years. Bender has been mediocre every year. tru however there is about a 10 game curve from the east to the west. If you stick Hawks in west they are 50 win team in the east they are 40 win team especially in the central
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 25, 2007 15:02:17 GMT -5
KG was dominant the first 3 years. Bender has been mediocre every year. tru however there is about a 10 game curve from the east to the west. If you stick Hawks in west they are 50 win team in the east they are 40 win team especially in the central Bad luck I suppose.
|
|
|
Post by JDawg on Jun 25, 2007 15:13:24 GMT -5
the central is a great division
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Jul 2, 2007 15:24:26 GMT -5
indeed.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 4, 2007 1:10:31 GMT -5
Tough to win in the Central for sure.
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Jul 26, 2007 14:15:58 GMT -5
So, who's in jeopardy of losing their job this year?
|
|