|
Post by Spencer on Jul 29, 2007 15:28:55 GMT -5
Im not a lawyer, so I dont write air tight rules. I do my best, but sometimes rules can be interpreted differently. So, from now on I will not accept a "loophole" in any league rulings. If you have questions surrounding a new or existing rule, it is your responsibility to contact me, and at that point I will further explain the rule in question. I will delegate league rulings based on MY interpretation of how it is written.
|
|
|
Post by djmyte on Jul 29, 2007 15:33:26 GMT -5
que?
|
|
|
Post by duce on Jul 29, 2007 15:37:26 GMT -5
flawed
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Jul 29, 2007 15:37:59 GMT -5
*Looks for loophole*
|
|
|
Post by Bender on Jul 29, 2007 19:22:36 GMT -5
so im guessing i cant quire picks for the next two seasons then bitch how u already took them all away and now i got more
|
|
|
Post by James on Jul 29, 2007 19:38:24 GMT -5
|
|
Rommie
Starter
Nets
Posts: 412
|
Post by Rommie on Jul 30, 2007 22:14:13 GMT -5
this question doesn't really have anything to do with this rule, just didn't see any point in starting a thread for it. but i guess you can consider it a loophole for avoiding the hard cap.
anyways one thing i have been wondering is if you are under the cap far enough and you sign a player can you do what the Bulls have done in real life and have their salary decrease from each year? If that makes anysense.
I'm pretty sure the Bulls did this. Hoopyshpye shows they did with Ben Wallace and Kirk Hinrich.
Ben Wallace: 15500000 14500000 14000000
Kirk Hinrich: 11000000 10000000 9500000 9000000 8000000
Pretty good idea to do. But of course it's a little difficult since you have to be far enough under the cap to do so.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jul 30, 2007 22:18:01 GMT -5
I dont think the game allows it. If it does, Id be willing to input bids like that.
|
|
|
Post by garf2000 on Jul 30, 2007 22:20:30 GMT -5
great idea
|
|
|
Post by James on Jul 30, 2007 22:20:58 GMT -5
Nah, the game does not allow it.
|
|
|
Post by GP on Jul 31, 2007 18:20:45 GMT -5
should call it the 'Dave Krupinski' rule
|
|