|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 21:01:02 GMT -5
8-6A little disappointing. Robinson and Olajuwon will be a hard duo for opponents to contain, however, the rest of my team is looking lacklustre. Even Stockton, surprisingly. Not sure what's up with him actually. I'll definitely look to start Patterson over Fox at SG. Horry looks better ratings-wise at SF, and should start. Danny Manning looks like a nice late round pick-up and we might look to get Rodman more involved, before he retires. I cant wait to see what kinda offense you run.
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Nov 21, 2006 21:08:47 GMT -5
6-9
Ervin Johnson = amazing 10pt 11 reb 2stl 2blk
|
|
|
Post by duce on Nov 21, 2006 21:09:20 GMT -5
i don't suppose you can tell me what pace/trap/press the cpu used for me..
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 21:13:09 GMT -5
i don't suppose you can tell me what pace/trap/press the cpu used for me.. Ask in the DC thread and Ill post it tomorrow when I sim. If I have to open FBB up again tonight Ill pop a blood vessel.
|
|
kjkeelty
Starter
Celtics
Go Green
Posts: 802
|
Post by kjkeelty on Nov 21, 2006 21:13:22 GMT -5
Yeah, I'm pleasantly surprised. It must be our defense, allowing only 86ppg. We're getting a decent number of steals, but virtually no blocked shots. So the success on D must be due more to the secondary ratings, positional D perhaps. Penny and Mailman are doing quite well. Action Jackson is steady at the point, though not spectacular. I need to get more minutes for Googs, though. Massenburg playing more minutes than Googs isn't acceptable. But it is nice to see Massenburg will probably be a solid backup. I worry now that it'll fall apart once I have to make the depth chart myself. But hey, that's part of the game, I'll figure out the right mix. Everyone played about as well as they could for you. I would tend to agree. We're not nearly that good over 82 games, I don't think.
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Nov 21, 2006 21:16:51 GMT -5
Starbury has to stop turning the damn ball over.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Nov 21, 2006 21:18:50 GMT -5
i don't suppose you can tell me what pace/trap/press the cpu used for me.. Ask in the DC thread and Ill post it tomorrow when I sim. If I have to open FBB up again tonight Ill pop a blood vessel. haha nah that's ok, i won't need it at that point. completely understand.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Nov 21, 2006 21:27:00 GMT -5
10-6! holy hell, only preseason but i didnt expect to win. Nash numbers are brilliant, guy is going to be the man. Harrington put up some sick bench numbers and traylor my boy, how dirty is he??? 12 10 2.5 bpg hes 21.
|
|
|
Post by manasrai on Nov 21, 2006 22:58:11 GMT -5
Scoring is a real problem for my team...but they seem to be playing pretty good defense.
The team really, really lacks scorers. Miller averaged a team high 17, while shooting well so that was pretty nice. Howard is also putting up some reasonable stats with 15, 7 and also getting 1.8 steals, and has almost a 2-1 assist to turnover ratio.
Im thinking it auto'd me an inside focus cuz only my big men did any scoring while most other starters were pretty deplorable.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Nov 21, 2006 23:02:50 GMT -5
Yikes, may be a long year. Anyone have an extra good scoring SF? chris mullin
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Nov 21, 2006 23:11:13 GMT -5
Well 4-9 not suprised by those results as we lack a backcourt really. I love what I got out of Malik Rose 12ppg, 9rpg, 2apg, 2spg, 2bpg as he looks to be a ready talent in this league at the ripe age of 23. KVH also is a stud at SF as his height and inside/out game seems to be a tough matchup for teams. Zo is obviously sick. I am left confused on what to do with sheed in order to get him some minutes so he can be productive because I am a firm believer that stats do reflect rating change ecspecially with potential being involved. Overall I like how my team is shaping up and I think the Bulls could be a very strong team.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Nov 21, 2006 23:51:11 GMT -5
We have a very good offensive team. We are sitting pretty at 9-3 because of our great team play.
|
|
|
Post by d2acollectables on Nov 22, 2006 0:09:10 GMT -5
6-4 better than i thought
|
|
|
Post by aaron2344 on Nov 22, 2006 0:22:38 GMT -5
good sim...10-3...very interested to see how Snow does running the point, since it seems someone else was....Shaq is going to be difficult to stop...Rice/Richmond/Barkley all are great options
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Nov 22, 2006 2:41:49 GMT -5
we are going to have problems scoring...
|
|
|
Post by Lumley316 on Nov 22, 2006 3:53:56 GMT -5
Man my depth alone seems to giving teams a fit, plus my guys dont miss shots. I seem to have drafted a very proficient group of guys who can sim great and feed off each other. Also thanks to the free upgrade Rahim went up in ratings. Thanks Spencer
|
|
|
Post by Bender on Nov 22, 2006 10:43:45 GMT -5
10 and 8 niceeeee
|
|