|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 20:13:13 GMT -5
|
|
KG
Starter
Timberwolves
Posts: 1,204
|
Post by KG on Nov 21, 2006 20:13:49 GMT -5
Love you.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 20:14:27 GMT -5
I just comped all teams. Uploading now.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Nov 21, 2006 20:17:46 GMT -5
I clicked the Nets, saw my record, and legit got pissed. Next time I'll make sure it's uploaded.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Nov 21, 2006 20:25:13 GMT -5
KG put up 25 on 60% shooting. Also, 10 rpg at SF. Stud!
|
|
|
Post by Vernon on Nov 21, 2006 20:26:18 GMT -5
12-5 with Othella Harrington averaging 23.9 ppg lol.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Nov 21, 2006 20:26:44 GMT -5
was preseason done with the upgrade or without?
|
|
KG
Starter
Timberwolves
Posts: 1,204
|
Post by KG on Nov 21, 2006 20:30:25 GMT -5
8-6
A little disappointing.
Robinson and Olajuwon will be a hard duo for opponents to contain, however, the rest of my team is looking lacklustre. Even Stockton, surprisingly. Not sure what's up with him actually.
I'll definitely look to start Patterson over Fox at SG. Horry looks better ratings-wise at SF, and should start. Danny Manning looks like a nice late round pick-up and we might look to get Rodman more involved, before he retires.
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Nov 21, 2006 20:33:00 GMT -5
Meh. We had way to many wins.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 20:35:49 GMT -5
was preseason done with the upgrade or without? Only the last 2 upgrades werent put through.
|
|
|
Post by garf2000 on Nov 21, 2006 20:38:26 GMT -5
no trainign camp right?
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Nov 21, 2006 20:42:52 GMT -5
9-5 sim. I think this team should be good. Duncan put up 24-11-5-2, and Gary Freakin' Trent put up 19 and 9 on 49% shooting. Houston had 18-5-4. He's going to be a stud scorer. Strickland was good, but not great. Hawkins got major time, but not much production. Really like this team.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 20:46:59 GMT -5
Celtics looks damn good. 15-2. Malone and Penny are an awesome inside outside duo.
Nets look strong. Their top 3 bigs all played well. They had essentially no production from their SF spot.
If the Knicks can get some offense, look out.
The Wiz had a great sim. 4 very good scoring options, and Joe Dumars played well at PG. PPs upgrade went in after the sim.
Hawks might have the best backcourt in the BBS.
Cavs look very strong with a very good 1-2-3 punch in Robinson, Jones and Cassell.
The Shaq-Barkley-Rice frontcourt looks tough in Detroit.
TWolves look nice, although I expected more. Improved strategies should help.
Spurs are a bit of a surprise. 12-5 behind Othella Harrington with no VC!
Grizzlies look like a solid club who should make the playoffs.
Warriors looked decent. Brandons increse went in after the sim, hopefully hell sim better during the year.
Trailblazers are a surprise team. Nash, Piatkowski, Traylor and Long?
Kings look dominant, even without a DC and set of strategies that went to Hills strengths.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 20:47:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Nov 21, 2006 20:53:35 GMT -5
I like my team defensively but we need to add another scorer next to pat and spree.
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on Nov 21, 2006 20:55:28 GMT -5
Yikes, may be a long year. Anyone have an extra good scoring SF?
|
|
kjkeelty
Starter
Celtics
Go Green
Posts: 802
|
Post by kjkeelty on Nov 21, 2006 20:56:49 GMT -5
Celtics looks damn good. 15-2. Malone and Penny are an awesome inside outside duo. Yeah, I'm pleasantly surprised. It must be our defense, allowing only 86ppg. We're getting a decent number of steals, but virtually no blocked shots. So the success on D must be due more to the secondary ratings, positional D perhaps. Penny and Mailman are doing quite well. Action Jackson is steady at the point, though not spectacular. I need to get more minutes for Googs, though. Massenburg playing more minutes than Googs isn't acceptable. But it is nice to see Massenburg will probably be a solid backup. I worry now that it'll fall apart once I have to make the depth chart myself. But hey, that's part of the game, I'll figure out the right mix.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 20:57:19 GMT -5
Yikes, may be a long year. Anyone have an extra good scoring SF? Id probably go small with your club. Play Jones at 2, NVE at 1 and DA at 3.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Nov 21, 2006 20:57:46 GMT -5
you could just opt to have it auto'd tho right
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 20:58:06 GMT -5
I like my team defensively but we need to add another scorer next to pat and spree. I love that Bowen and Wallace are on the same team. I only hope that they both become All-League defenders.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 20:58:49 GMT -5
you could just opt to have it auto'd tho right Ya, Ill always post the auto lineup if you ask for it in your DC thread. Although in your case Duce Id never let the computer run my DC again. Your team played very poorly.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 20:59:31 GMT -5
Celtics looks damn good. 15-2. Malone and Penny are an awesome inside outside duo. Yeah, I'm pleasantly surprised. It must be our defense, allowing only 86ppg. We're getting a decent number of steals, but virtually no blocked shots. So the success on D must be due more to the secondary ratings, positional D perhaps. Penny and Mailman are doing quite well. Action Jackson is steady at the point, though not spectacular. I need to get more minutes for Googs, though. Massenburg playing more minutes than Googs isn't acceptable. But it is nice to see Massenburg will probably be a solid backup. I worry now that it'll fall apart once I have to make the depth chart myself. But hey, that's part of the game, I'll figure out the right mix. Everyone played about as well as they could for you.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Nov 21, 2006 20:59:45 GMT -5
haha yeah, it did.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 21:00:07 GMT -5
9-5 sim. I think this team should be good. Duncan put up 24-11-5-2, and Gary Freakin' Trent put up 19 and 9 on 49% shooting. Houston had 18-5-4. He's going to be a stud scorer. Strickland was good, but not great. Hawkins got major time, but not much production. Really like this team. Gonna move Houston to SF?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 21, 2006 21:00:26 GMT -5
12-5 with Othella Harrington averaging 23.9 ppg lol. Ridiculous.
|
|