|
Post by Bender on Apr 8, 2007 19:35:42 GMT -5
interested in feed back
PG magic sg MJ sf dominique PF malone C Shaq
shaq has just dominated over career all time which is why i would take him as my 5 . that was def the toughest though
|
|
|
Post by duce on Apr 8, 2007 19:47:49 GMT -5
PG najera SG najera SF najera PF najera C najera
|
|
|
Post by manasrai on Apr 8, 2007 19:55:22 GMT -5
Nique and Malone may be replacable..
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Apr 8, 2007 19:59:40 GMT -5
yea...what he said
bird? Russel? Chamberlin?
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Apr 8, 2007 20:27:51 GMT -5
the Big O and Wilt would probably be on mine
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Apr 8, 2007 20:28:29 GMT -5
PG Oscar Robertson SG Michael Jordan SF Larry Bird PF Charles Barkley C Wilt Chamberlain
|
|
|
Post by manasrai on Apr 8, 2007 20:35:17 GMT -5
I'd take magic over Robertson. Nique probably wouldnt make my top 3 all time at SF
|
|
|
Post by JDawg on Apr 8, 2007 21:28:22 GMT -5
same as chris except Malone over Barkley.
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Apr 8, 2007 21:30:59 GMT -5
oh yeah...
where Patrick Ewing at?
|
|
kjkeelty
Starter
Celtics
Go Green
Posts: 802
|
Post by kjkeelty on Apr 8, 2007 21:34:45 GMT -5
PG: Oscar SG: Jordan SF: Bird PF: Kareem C: Wilt I know Kareem's a C too, but I think they're both deserving, so we'll run with twin towers.
|
|
|
Post by GP on Apr 8, 2007 21:53:37 GMT -5
Bird over Nique and I think Kareem over Shaq
|
|
|
Post by Bender on Apr 8, 2007 23:52:28 GMT -5
patrick would prolly be a 5 to 7 type center although he does get a raw deal since carried the team till like 92 93
|
|
|
Post by aigatdula on Apr 9, 2007 5:27:50 GMT -5
PG Magic sg MJ sf Bird PF TD C Shaq
all these players had significant contributions to their team specially at their prime...
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Apr 9, 2007 8:31:26 GMT -5
patrick would prolly be a 5 to 7 type center although he does get a raw deal since carried the team till like 92 93 yeah i think i have him 7th or 8th... I was jm around about him on best team alltime list
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Apr 9, 2007 8:32:06 GMT -5
PG Oscar Robertson SG Michael Jordan SF Larry Bird PF Tim Duncan C Wilt Chamberlain
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on Apr 9, 2007 9:59:47 GMT -5
PG-Magic SG-MJ SF-Bird PF-McHale C-Kareem
Magic is best player of all time in my eyes. He starts at PG. Jordan is Jordan, Bird's all around game I cant ignore. McHale is so underated. Good defender and the sweetest post moves I ever saw. He'd get defender leaning/jumping one way and go the other way and score at will nearly.Also had arms of a 7'6 man. Freak of nature. Mchale used to kick Malone's and every other PF's butt in his prime. Duncan at PF would be very close 2nd here. And center had to be Kareem who was a very underated defender and had the most unstoppable shot of all time in the skyhook as well as other moves to keep defender honest.
|
|
|
Post by aaron2344 on Apr 9, 2007 10:30:28 GMT -5
PG - Oscar SG - MJ SF - Pippen PF - Russell C - Chamberlin
|
|
|
Post by Vernon on Apr 9, 2007 11:26:06 GMT -5
PG: Oscar SG: Jordan SF: Bird PF: Bosh C: Wilt
|
|
|
Post by manasrai on Apr 9, 2007 11:43:45 GMT -5
out of curiosity, where does someone like Hakeem fall into most people's C rankings?
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on Apr 9, 2007 13:04:22 GMT -5
I have Hakeem about 3. Kareem,Wilt then Hakeem followed by Shaq. Hakeem isnt appreciated for being as good as he was since he did'nt play in the East or LA. I'd take Hakeem over Shaq in his prime. Much better defender and better rebounder and could score just as well not to mention he could run like a deer.
|
|
|
Post by Lumley316 on Apr 9, 2007 14:06:01 GMT -5
PG Magic sg MJ sf Bird PF TD C Shaq all these players had significant contributions to their team specially at their prime... I like this one alot, but could take Wilt over shaq
|
|
|
Post by duce on Apr 9, 2007 14:40:52 GMT -5
no respect for najera, tisk tisk..
|
|
|
Post by JDawg on Apr 9, 2007 14:57:29 GMT -5
yea 3 is right for hakeem. he is one of my fav players all-time, other than MJ.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Apr 9, 2007 15:40:58 GMT -5
I have Hakeem about 3. Kareem,Wilt then Hakeem followed by Shaq. Hakeem isnt appreciated for being as good as he was since he did'nt play in the East or LA. I'd take Hakeem over Shaq in his prime. Much better defender and better rebounder and could score just as well not to mention he could run like a deer. Hakeem would make Shaq look like a dummy when he was in Orlando.
|
|
|
Post by aaron2344 on Apr 9, 2007 15:43:25 GMT -5
I have Hakeem about 3. Kareem,Wilt then Hakeem followed by Shaq. Hakeem isnt appreciated for being as good as he was since he did'nt play in the East or LA. I'd take Hakeem over Shaq in his prime. Much better defender and better rebounder and could score just as well not to mention he could run like a deer. Hakeem would make Shaq look like a dummy when he was in Orlando. i wonder who is better in their primes...shaq was a pup when he played dream in the finals....that'd be an interesting matchup
|
|