|
Post by Adelaide on Dec 12, 2007 16:35:10 GMT -5
I'm sure you could have gotten some other very nice offers for Wade... then it would completely defeat the purpose of me trading away livingston, stephenson, mullens, and shved for him. I may make bad deals but that's one thing I won't do, trade in circles. It wouldn't be trading in circles if you were getting veteran talent that would help you win.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 12, 2007 16:36:53 GMT -5
dtrue
|
|
|
Post by James on Dec 12, 2007 16:55:09 GMT -5
I'd probably never deal that many firsts unless it was going to push my team over the top to become a championship caliber team, even then...
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Dec 12, 2007 16:57:33 GMT -5
I'd probably never deal that many firsts unless it was going to push my team over the top to become a championship caliber team, even then... Because you tank with firsts, we know this.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Dec 12, 2007 17:14:58 GMT -5
I'd probably never deal that many firsts unless it was going to push my team over the top to become a championship caliber team, even then... Because you tank with firsts, we know this. Do we Aaron? Or is it just a smokescreen put up to guard the real truth?
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Dec 12, 2007 17:16:04 GMT -5
it is a lot of firsts, but howard should make the grizz a lot better... the one this year should not be much unless they start to get hurt.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Dec 12, 2007 17:17:37 GMT -5
Because you tank with firsts, we know this. Do we Aaron? Or is it just a smokescreen put up to guard the real truth? Hey, you seem bored.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Dec 12, 2007 17:20:06 GMT -5
Do we Aaron? Or is it just a smokescreen put up to guard the real truth? Hey, you seem bored. Am I bored Aaron? Or do I throw a smokescreen of boredom at you to shroud the endless excitement I may or may not be enjoying?
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Dec 12, 2007 17:21:59 GMT -5
Am I bored Aaron? Or do I throw a smokescreen of boredom at you to shroud the endless excitement I may or may not be enjoying? You're bored.
|
|
|
Post by James on Dec 12, 2007 17:23:12 GMT -5
I am not and have never tanked.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Dec 12, 2007 17:24:44 GMT -5
I am not and have never tanked. You tanked?
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Dec 12, 2007 17:24:55 GMT -5
I am not and have never tanked. Boris Diaw agrees!
|
|
|
Post by nova on Dec 12, 2007 17:26:47 GMT -5
I'm not sure how you can call benching Diaw tanking.
Atlanta dealt him because he played like crap as a starter,
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Dec 12, 2007 17:27:27 GMT -5
james doesn't tank he just sucks
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Dec 12, 2007 17:28:45 GMT -5
Boris Diaw should be starting as 3rd option.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on Dec 12, 2007 17:28:51 GMT -5
I'm not sure how you can call benching Diaw tanking. Atlanta dealt him because he played like crap as a starter, You sure the stats didn't act as a smokescreen shrouding Boris Diaw's true talent?
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Dec 12, 2007 17:30:23 GMT -5
I'm not sure how you can call benching Diaw tanking. Atlanta dealt him because he played like crap as a starter, Diaw is a pretty good proven player in BBS--the only one on Golden State.
|
|
|
Post by James on Dec 12, 2007 17:38:12 GMT -5
I'd start Batum over Diaw every single day of the week.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 12, 2007 18:18:02 GMT -5
james doesn't tank he just sucks haha agreed.
|
|
|
Post by nova on Dec 12, 2007 18:30:55 GMT -5
Diaw has had one season of above 16ppg in his career, he's meant to be a back-up.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Dec 12, 2007 18:36:36 GMT -5
he was on a stacked lakers team and was a super sub. Louis Williams, Batum, Diaw should be James 1-2-3
|
|
|
Post by James on Dec 12, 2007 18:49:29 GMT -5
Nah.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Dec 12, 2007 20:00:41 GMT -5
he was on a stacked lakers team and was a super sub. Louis Williams, Batum, Diaw should be James 1-2-3 Yep... Batum shouldn't be playing the 3, ever.
|
|
|
Post by James on Dec 12, 2007 20:45:13 GMT -5
he was on a stacked lakers team and was a super sub. Louis Williams, Batum, Diaw should be James 1-2-3 Yep... Batum shouldn't be playing the 3, ever. Thanks for that, New Orleans, Sacramento, Memphis. I'll take your advice on board.
|
|
|
Post by James on Dec 12, 2007 20:46:54 GMT -5
Btw, I'm not really taking any of your advice on board.
|
|