|
Post by Spencer on Feb 12, 2007 23:23:32 GMT -5
-You must start your best players. I will correct any errors I see and PM the GM in question.
-Obvious misuse of backup players will be less likely to be enforced, but if something is blatant, I will correct any errors I see and PM the GM in question.
-Your offensive options must be your best players. I will correct any errors I see and PM the GM in question.
-An inside or outside focus must fit your offense players. An outside focus must have better outside scorers. An inside offense must have better inside options. I will correct any errors I see and PM the GM in question.
-I will not control pressing and trapping in any way.
-A minimum salary cap will be enforced. All teams must always be above 33 million dollars in salary. The minimum salary will always be 10 less then the BBS Cap.
-If you want to lose, trade your good players.
-If you get more then 3 PMs in any year because of tanking I will take away all your Reward Camps for the following year.
|
|
|
Post by garf2000 on Feb 12, 2007 23:24:15 GMT -5
love it
|
|
|
Post by GP on Feb 12, 2007 23:24:19 GMT -5
sounds good.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Feb 12, 2007 23:26:41 GMT -5
i want it more harsh....i love it except for the last rule about more then 3 pms i think he shouldn't be allowed to use rc's on any player drafted that year for his career
|
|
|
Post by duce on Feb 12, 2007 23:29:29 GMT -5
*sigh* i absolutely hate that it came to this. i have no intention and never have of tanking in an unfair way but yet i know that i pride myself on succeeding by doing unorthadox things with my depth charts and now this is potentially taken away. gay.
i'm also not sure the 33M thing will work out - particularly for rebuilding teams but i have no beef with it.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Feb 12, 2007 23:30:03 GMT -5
Oh Dave I like that. Screw with the player he is tanking for.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Feb 12, 2007 23:32:02 GMT -5
*sigh* i absolutely hate that it came to this. i have no intention and never have of tanking in an unfair way but yet i know that i pride myself on succeeding by doing unorthadox things with my depth charts and now this is potentially taken away. gay. i'm also not sure the 33M thing will work out - particularly for rebuilding teams but i have no beef with it. key word you said is you succeeded in doing what you did with your dc....so why worry?
|
|
|
Post by aaron2344 on Feb 12, 2007 23:32:26 GMT -5
i agree with krupinski...make it as harsh as possible
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 12, 2007 23:32:53 GMT -5
*sigh* i absolutely hate that it came to this. i have no intention and never have of tanking in an unfair way but yet i know that i pride myself on succeeding by doing unorthadox things with my depth charts and now this is potentially taken away. gay. i'm also not sure the 33M thing will work out - particularly for rebuilding teams but i have no beef with it. You can sign crappy players to satisfy the rule.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 12, 2007 23:34:26 GMT -5
i agree with krupinski...make it as harsh as possible The most important thing is that no games will be played with DCs that dont make sense. I will change the DC and PM the GM. I think this is harsh enough.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Feb 12, 2007 23:34:54 GMT -5
*sigh* i absolutely hate that it came to this. i have no intention and never have of tanking in an unfair way but yet i know that i pride myself on succeeding by doing unorthadox things with my depth charts and now this is potentially taken away. gay. i'm also not sure the 33M thing will work out - particularly for rebuilding teams but i have no beef with it. key word you said is you succeeded in doing what you did with your dc....so why worry? well i'm worried because it sounds like i can be issued a warning for doing something spencer finds to be sketchy. and if that's the case it takes the entire fun out of sim leagues for me... and i know this rule isn't JUST about me and all that but i can't help but see it as a disadvantage.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 12, 2007 23:36:21 GMT -5
key word you said is you succeeded in doing what you did with your dc....so why worry? well i'm worried because it sounds like i can be issued a warning for doing something spencer finds to be sketchy. and if that's the case it takes the entire fun out of sim leagues for me... and i know this rule isn't JUST about me and all that but i can't help but see it as a disadvantage. If you reason out the DC for me I might accept it. But would you run an outside offense with KG and Hill? I doubt it, and thats kinda what Im trying todefend against.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Feb 12, 2007 23:37:07 GMT -5
Duce, I'm sure there will be some leniency when it comes to situations like the one you're presenting. You're not tanking. If you have a couple screwy things going on with your DC, I don't see why Spence wouldn't look by it. It's the crap like DJ's DC that needs to be looked at.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Feb 12, 2007 23:37:52 GMT -5
key word you said is you succeeded in doing what you did with your dc....so why worry? well i'm worried because it sounds like i can be issued a warning for doing something spencer finds to be sketchy. and if that's the case it takes the entire fun out of sim leagues for me... and i know this rule isn't JUST about me and all that but i can't help but see it as a disadvantage. you were also scared about using pay pal...do you live in a bubble?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 12, 2007 23:38:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by duce on Feb 12, 2007 23:40:41 GMT -5
lmao
|
|
|
Post by duce on Feb 12, 2007 23:41:35 GMT -5
well i'm worried because it sounds like i can be issued a warning for doing something spencer finds to be sketchy. and if that's the case it takes the entire fun out of sim leagues for me... and i know this rule isn't JUST about me and all that but i can't help but see it as a disadvantage. If you reason out the DC for me I might accept it. But would you run an outside offense with KG and Hill? I doubt it, and thats kinda what Im trying todefend against. ok, i'm happy to give an explination on anything asked of me. i probably wouldn't do that but let's say i play Hill @ SG(or pg) and KG @ SF. as silly as it sounds, outside becomes a possibility, especially if my PF and C blow offensively. this is not likely for me but i'll do weird stuff on occasion... and i don't think i'm the only one.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 12, 2007 23:43:13 GMT -5
If you reason out the DC for me I might accept it. But would you run an outside offense with KG and Hill? I doubt it, and thats kinda what Im trying todefend against. ok, i'm happy to give an explination on anything asked of me. i probably wouldn't do that but let's say i play Hill @ SG(or pg) and KG @ SF. as silly as it sounds, outside becomes a possibility, especially if my PF and C blow offensively. this is not likely for me but i'll do weird stuff on occasion... and i don't think i'm the only one. Um, Duce, I think I said that it might be a good idea to play KG at SF many times last year. And I also posted about how dominant Hill was at Pg for the Pistons. Why would you think I wouldnt be ok with that?
|
|
C.C.
Backup
Posts: 233
|
Post by C.C. on Feb 12, 2007 23:43:41 GMT -5
there goes a piece of my future plan. but if the rules are to improve the league, let it be.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Feb 12, 2007 23:43:45 GMT -5
love ya spencey
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 12, 2007 23:44:07 GMT -5
If you reason out the DC for me I might accept it. But would you run an outside offense with KG and Hill? I doubt it, and thats kinda what Im trying todefend against. ok, i'm happy to give an explination on anything asked of me. i probably wouldn't do that but let's say i play Hill @ SG(or pg) and KG @ SF. as silly as it sounds, outside becomes a possibility, especially if my PF and C blow offensively. this is not likely for me but i'll do weird stuff on occasion... and i don't think i'm the only one. And just to make it clear, Im not gonna ask for explanations. If something needs an explanation it better come with one, otherwise you get a PM from me.
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Feb 12, 2007 23:45:08 GMT -5
You should just take picks away.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Feb 12, 2007 23:45:12 GMT -5
ok, i'm happy to give an explination on anything asked of me. i probably wouldn't do that but let's say i play Hill @ SG(or pg) and KG @ SF. as silly as it sounds, outside becomes a possibility, especially if my PF and C blow offensively. this is not likely for me but i'll do weird stuff on occasion... and i don't think i'm the only one. Um, Duce, I think I said that it might be a good idea to play KG at SF many times last year. And I also posted about how dominant Hill was at Pg for the Pistons. Why would you think I wouldnt be ok with that? i dunno, nevermind. the rule is fine... the point of that was using outside focus, maybe not the best example in the world.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 12, 2007 23:49:56 GMT -5
You should just take picks away. Its a possibility.
|
|
|
Post by garf2000 on Feb 12, 2007 23:54:01 GMT -5
duce, if your team is winning, thats all that matters.
|
|