|
Post by Spencer on Oct 9, 2007 10:28:07 GMT -5
Tyrus Thomas Anton Ponkrashov Cenk Akyol
for
Andrew Ogilvy Acie Law
I like Law more then Thomas, and Ogilvy more then Anton and Cenk, plus we needed roster space for another deal.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Oct 9, 2007 10:32:20 GMT -5
I like it for Mark because it's a necessary move. Law's a waste on his team, and he has so much offense that TT is a perfect fit to add some defensive presence in his lineup.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 9, 2007 10:35:08 GMT -5
Ya, Thomas' shot blocking is a plus, but at this point we need to add talent, not try and piece together a team. I felt that adding 2 for 1 essentially was key.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Oct 9, 2007 10:37:21 GMT -5
Sorry, have a Psych test soon and am studying. Yeah, confirm. I shoot myself in the foot by having Bargnani and TT expire at the same time, but I needed a shotblocker, and I'm pretty sure he's about to become a stud. Maybe not. We'll see.
Law was a waste, I played Tinsley over him (and like Tinsley quite a bit). Ogilvy is intriguing, but I needed to add some high level talent because I think i can win 50 this year. Now I have Monta/Martell/Bargnani, and then any 2 of TT/Dice/Kandi starting. I like it a lot.
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Oct 9, 2007 10:42:49 GMT -5
Spence are you going to help me when i decide to rebuild?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 9, 2007 10:45:55 GMT -5
Spence are you going to help me when i decide to rebuild? If you want, sure. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Oct 9, 2007 10:47:24 GMT -5
lol.. Well i dont want your help. Just give me free rc's
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Oct 9, 2007 10:47:29 GMT -5
I hope TT offers me something affordable at the end of the year.
|
|
|
Post by aigatdula on Oct 9, 2007 11:29:04 GMT -5
Law looks nice...
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Oct 9, 2007 11:39:03 GMT -5
ty is an expiring and i wouldn't want to pay him. I think Ogilvy is a nice spect that most don't know about. He is a shot blocker too.
Law is a nice player even though I wanted to keep Anton but in Spence I trust.
|
|
|
Post by aaron2344 on Oct 9, 2007 12:12:27 GMT -5
great, just saw this
i was going to offer a nice package too
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Oct 9, 2007 14:29:48 GMT -5
Fuck Martinez.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Oct 9, 2007 14:30:06 GMT -5
Lets get some posts in my thread.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Oct 9, 2007 14:38:58 GMT -5
OK that didn't work.
Trade in.
|
|
|
Post by nova on Oct 9, 2007 15:24:03 GMT -5
Solid for both, though I assume the Bulls plan on dealing Law since they have Conley; or maybe the other way around.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Oct 9, 2007 15:25:17 GMT -5
Solid for both, though I assume the Bulls plan on dealing Law since they have Conley; or maybe the other way around. I can't have a good backup PG?
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Oct 9, 2007 15:26:26 GMT -5
I love Law, I think he is so good. People were so annoying when I was shopping him.
|
|
|
Post by nova on Oct 9, 2007 15:27:15 GMT -5
Solid for both, though I assume the Bulls plan on dealing Law since they have Conley; or maybe the other way around. I can't have a good backup PG? You can, I just figured it would make more sense to deal one of them at some point to fill another need.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Oct 9, 2007 15:32:06 GMT -5
Conley, Prince, Outlaw, McRoberts/Hansbrough/Ogivly/Lawal, Z
Backups Law, Brewer, Dudley
I am pretty solid and young all around, I can easily make the playoffs again
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Oct 9, 2007 15:33:09 GMT -5
I'll give you expirings and a pick for Z.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Oct 9, 2007 15:40:26 GMT -5
don't have the roster space for expirings....also depends on the pick
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 9, 2007 17:15:24 GMT -5
I like the idea of Conley starting and law off the bench. I think Law could be a pretty good scorer. I also quite like the idea of Brewer at SG long term which means we have a solid 3 man rotation there.
|
|