|
Post by aaronjh on Aug 2, 2007 12:50:57 GMT -5
pacers send mike redd pape sow
magic send vitaly potapenko, stro swift, david noel, 2010 first, 2012 first
really liked what redd was doing for me this year, and i clearly don't have enough around baron. it's tough to go without firsts, but i want to compete, and my next move is to lock up outlaw. a baron-redd-outlaw-randolph core isn't going to win a championship, but i think i'm a definitely playoff team for awhile now.
good dealing, duce.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Aug 2, 2007 12:58:49 GMT -5
cut raja bell. hopefully people on waivers notice them, i don't wanna cut good players but i have no choice.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Aug 2, 2007 12:59:43 GMT -5
good dealin habes, my team wasn't really doing anything significant, these were the best 2 picks i could get for redd... so sorry bout that jah but yeah... gl aaron.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Aug 2, 2007 13:08:59 GMT -5
I would have added more..you didn't ask...
Just because I'm bitter that both of them didn't respond to me (Duce did 2 days ago but the Magic proposed a trade to me and then ignored me for 3 days)
5) Players cannot be traded back and forth in the same trade. A trade back of players must wait 4 sims.
This trade cannot go through until AFTER tommorows sim. (Redd was traded from Magic to Pacers 3 sims ago.)
|
|
|
Post by duce on Aug 2, 2007 13:27:49 GMT -5
oh thanks a lot bitter jah! i mean i acknowledged your offer, just so you know. if anything i'll suffer because you would have gone higher and i didn't think you would. had i not dealt redd or orlando i would have posted your offer... i just wasn't thinking right and didn't think to reply. and that's my story.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Aug 2, 2007 13:39:08 GMT -5
Its fine...you just have to wait an extra day! lol And I gave expiring 2 1sts and an upgrade...boo.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Aug 2, 2007 13:58:05 GMT -5
trade's been edited with a change
|
|
|
Post by duce on Aug 2, 2007 14:00:56 GMT -5
agreed to change, i'll edit mine too
|
|
|
Post by nova on Aug 2, 2007 14:01:05 GMT -5
Oh you bitch.
|
|
|
Post by nova on Aug 2, 2007 14:01:29 GMT -5
cut pape sow and raja bell. hopefully people on waivers notice them, i don't wanna cut good players but i have no choice. Motherfucker.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Aug 2, 2007 14:09:14 GMT -5
How's that for karma?
|
|
|
Post by duce on Aug 2, 2007 14:09:36 GMT -5
lol, oh shit
|
|
|
Post by nova on Aug 2, 2007 14:12:42 GMT -5
Damnit lol. I gotta admit, that was good.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Aug 2, 2007 14:26:29 GMT -5
Sow should be on waivers...trade was posted and agreed and waiver claim was in....but hey I don't care..not like i'm going to sign him.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Aug 2, 2007 14:40:59 GMT -5
Sow should be on waivers...trade was posted and agreed and waiver claim was in....but hey I don't care..not like i'm going to sign him. See, but the trade as posted wasn't valid, so we can just call it invalid and make a new trade thread tomorrow, or we can just keep it as is, make an addendum and wait for it to go through tomorrow, since we have time to revise it. If a trade hasn't been processed or accepted, why shouldn't both parties be allowed to add to it?
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Aug 2, 2007 15:20:16 GMT -5
Caps worked just fine and players were cut to make roster space......Players were claimed on waivers. I personally don't care about it, however the Hornets (or any team below them in the standings) got shafted.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Aug 2, 2007 16:00:05 GMT -5
Caps worked just fine and players were cut to make roster space......Players were claimed on waivers. I personally don't care about it, however the Hornets (or any team below them in the standings) got shafted. All that's nice, but the trade, as posted, wasn't valid, so neither were the moves. It can't be processed for next sim, so we have a lot of time to revise it.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Aug 2, 2007 16:30:59 GMT -5
As I said doesn't effect me at all. You can justify it however you want....I personally wouldn't do it, its kind of shady.
As it doesn't pertain to me I won't be commenting on it anymore.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Aug 2, 2007 16:53:26 GMT -5
shocker haberman sacrificing his team's future
|
|
|
Post by duce on Aug 2, 2007 17:16:47 GMT -5
i don't see the big deal, people add and subtract from trades ALL the time after they're posted. if there's a rule made in place after this then fine but there's nothing saying that both gm's can't agree to change the trade. if we both just decided to delete the entire deal right now, would anyone really care?
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Aug 2, 2007 18:04:47 GMT -5
dave, redd's a 26 year old option scorer. shut up already.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Aug 2, 2007 21:47:46 GMT -5
dave, redd's a 26 year old option scorer. shut up already. I said nothing about Redd. I just think sacrificing your future draft choices is not a wise decision but you have "plan" so I'm sure everything will work out.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Aug 3, 2007 10:49:39 GMT -5
trade in
|
|