|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:17:18 GMT -5
Post by Spencer on Jan 11, 2007 20:17:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:21:39 GMT -5
Post by jahallstar on Jan 11, 2007 20:21:39 GMT -5
Can we make like 1 player excempt?
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:23:10 GMT -5
Post by Adelaide on Jan 11, 2007 20:23:10 GMT -5
I just dont like a couple things. I don't like how GM's have plans and how something like this could distrupt it a lot and I dont like the idea of a total crapshoot screwing up one of my players. I would like it more if you would of just said the teams of the boom and bust players so it can't distrupt trade value because the whole league in real time NBA dosent know which player will boom or bust
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:27:08 GMT -5
Post by Adelaide on Jan 11, 2007 20:27:08 GMT -5
And if possible the bust part should implicate injury as a factor, players who have had been sidelined with injuries longer or have had multiple injuries should be more vulnerble to the bust factor.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:33:53 GMT -5
Post by aaron2344 on Jan 11, 2007 20:33:53 GMT -5
And if possible the bust part should implicate injury as a factor, players who have had been sidelined with injuries longer or have had multiple injuries should be more vulnerble to the bust factor. that's an interesting idea...if a guy gets hurt for more than 100 days, he potential drops 10 or 20.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:37:59 GMT -5
Post by Spencer on Jan 11, 2007 20:37:59 GMT -5
Injuries in some leagues drop potential.
I dont really understand you argument Pig.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:41:30 GMT -5
Post by nybombers3 on Jan 11, 2007 20:41:30 GMT -5
Meh. Not a huge fan really. Mostly because i'd rather not see one of my young players all of a sudden just turn into a mediocre prospect and all because of a random number generator.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:42:13 GMT -5
Post by Spencer on Jan 11, 2007 20:42:13 GMT -5
I would like it more if you would of just said the teams of the boom and bust players so it can't distrupt trade value because the whole league in real time NBA dosent know which player will boom or bust This doesnt make sense to me.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:45:10 GMT -5
Post by nybombers3 on Jan 11, 2007 20:45:10 GMT -5
I would like it more if you would of just said the teams of the boom and bust players so it can't distrupt trade value because the whole league in real time NBA dosent know which player will boom or bust This doesnt make sense to me. I'm guessing he means you do the whole random thing but don't mention which players actually gets affected since nobody in the real NBA knows who's going to break out/bust.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:47:16 GMT -5
Post by Spencer on Jan 11, 2007 20:47:16 GMT -5
What if I just do it anyway and dont tell anyone!
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:49:02 GMT -5
Post by jahallstar on Jan 11, 2007 20:49:02 GMT -5
Can we make like 1 player excempt?
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:50:23 GMT -5
Post by Spencer on Jan 11, 2007 20:50:23 GMT -5
Can we make like 1 player excempt? Im leaning towards not doing it now. I dont want to have players exempt. I wanted it to be just a random good or bad thing.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:53:28 GMT -5
Post by Brian on Jan 11, 2007 20:53:28 GMT -5
What if I just do it anyway and dont tell anyone! I say go for it. But tell me.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 20:54:33 GMT -5
Post by Brian on Jan 11, 2007 20:54:33 GMT -5
I keep seeing the goddamn Warriors logo and thinking "I didn't post that."
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 21:06:15 GMT -5
Post by Adelaide on Jan 11, 2007 21:06:15 GMT -5
This doesnt make sense to me. I'm guessing he means you do the whole random thing but don't mention which players actually gets affected since nobody in the real NBA knows who's going to break out/bust. Bingo.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 21:07:39 GMT -5
Post by Adelaide on Jan 11, 2007 21:07:39 GMT -5
I mean like I just dont like the fact the whole league knows whose gonna bust, in the NBA they don't know who is gonna bust or who is gonna boom I just think its unrealistic to give this information out to the whole league......with this said I think what should happen is you should just PM every team individually being and say whether one of that specific team's members boomed or bust, because I would assume that a real GM could see this throughout practices and shit, and it wouldn't effect that players trade value on short-term levels.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 21:11:08 GMT -5
Post by jahallstar on Jan 11, 2007 21:11:08 GMT -5
Well there is a good chance we'll see who busts if their real potential thats that big of a hit.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 21:13:28 GMT -5
Post by Spencer on Jan 11, 2007 21:13:28 GMT -5
I mean like I just dont like the fact the whole league knows whose gonna bust, in the NBA they don't know who is gonna bust or who is gonna boom I just think its unrealistic to give this information out to the whole league......with this said I think what should happen is you should just PM every team individually being and say whether one of that specific team's members boomed or bust, because I would assume that a real GM could see this throughout practices and shit, and it wouldn't effect that players trade value on short-term levels. Its either I tell everyone, or no one.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 21:14:35 GMT -5
Post by KruPaxson on Jan 11, 2007 21:14:35 GMT -5
well for this does the potential only stay in tact for 1 season? or for their career?
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 21:15:31 GMT -5
Post by Spencer on Jan 11, 2007 21:15:31 GMT -5
well for this does the potential only stay in tact for 1 season? or for their career? I change their potential. I wont change it back. That would be silly.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 21:15:59 GMT -5
Post by ducky on Jan 11, 2007 21:15:59 GMT -5
Well I got an Idea...
So you randomly select 1 player to gain 25 potential and 1 player to lose 25 potential. Then you PM the team, which has the player who gained/losed 25 potential and you tell them "Someone on your team has gained/losed 25 potential." But you don't tell them who it is... I thought this was deliciously clever. That way the GM doesn't know if its some scrub or their all-star player. eh?
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 21:17:59 GMT -5
Post by Adelaide on Jan 11, 2007 21:17:59 GMT -5
I mean like I just dont like the fact the whole league knows whose gonna bust, in the NBA they don't know who is gonna bust or who is gonna boom I just think its unrealistic to give this information out to the whole league......with this said I think what should happen is you should just PM every team individually being and say whether one of that specific team's members boomed or bust, because I would assume that a real GM could see this throughout practices and shit, and it wouldn't effect that players trade value on short-term levels. Its either I tell everyone, or no one. I dont see why that has to be the deal though, coaches watch there players in practice and they can see who is declining and who is stepping up. With that said I would choose no one over everyone
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 21:19:29 GMT -5
Post by Adelaide on Jan 11, 2007 21:19:29 GMT -5
Spence, I wouldn't implement this after TC this year though whatever you decide, I think this needs to be a little more organized then what it is now.
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 21:21:48 GMT -5
Post by KruPaxson on Jan 11, 2007 21:21:48 GMT -5
well originally you said guys blow up and guys disappear...flip murray blew up and he has been avg since...thats why i mentioned the 1 yr. if it's forever i'm not sure i like it bc it would reward someone on shear luck
|
|
|
Idea
Jan 11, 2007 21:29:01 GMT -5
Post by KruPaxson on Jan 11, 2007 21:29:01 GMT -5
if you do it before tc their ratings could change.....if you do it after tc will it effect their performance
|
|