|
Post by The X-Factor on Sept 19, 2007 17:29:14 GMT -5
These will be the general idea of the Keeper league.
Each team will be able to keep a MAX of five players. Only two of these players can be in there 3rd season in the NBA or less. Meaning you can only have 2 players who have less than 3 seasons in the NBA. You can have 5 players who have 4 seasons or more.
i.e.
3 season player Rookie Veteran(4 seasons and up) Veteran Veteran
or Veteran Veteran Veteran Veteran Rookie
etc.
so don't think just cause you draft Oden, Jianlin, Durant, Conley, and Roy you're keeping them all, ha.
|
|
KG
Starter
Timberwolves
Posts: 1,204
|
Post by KG on Sept 19, 2007 17:29:41 GMT -5
I joined, so maybe there's only 1 spot left?
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Sept 19, 2007 17:30:05 GMT -5
I realized you had no intentions of being active when you haven't responded to anything in the Official Fantasy Football thread.
|
|
|
Post by aaronjh on Sept 19, 2007 17:32:30 GMT -5
I realized you had no intentions of being active when you haven't responded to anything in the Official Fantasy Football thread. was talking about basketball.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Sept 19, 2007 19:09:41 GMT -5
who cares let him into the league
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Sept 19, 2007 19:38:08 GMT -5
Who gives a shit
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Sept 19, 2007 19:58:29 GMT -5
I do, the fact that you'd still have Brandon Jacobs as your starting RB in week 3 until I changed it should say something.
If you didn't care to be in that league you shouldn't have joined in the first place.
Yeah it's a free league, so who cares? Though so is BBS and just like Spence I don't like in activity. I'm not saying check everyday but a whole month? Please.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Sept 19, 2007 20:02:41 GMT -5
if he wants in he needs to get another handle, it won't let me unlock a team.
This goes for anyone, if your inactive im locking your team.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Sept 19, 2007 20:40:38 GMT -5
I don't think we really need this type of enforcement, honestly.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Sept 19, 2007 21:43:41 GMT -5
you're right, it's much more fun practically have a bye week as the team your playing against has 5 guys on IR.
|
|
|
Post by Bender on Sept 19, 2007 21:46:28 GMT -5
ill be in if theres anything left
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Sept 19, 2007 21:54:17 GMT -5
make the league larger it will be more competitive this way
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Sept 19, 2007 21:59:04 GMT -5
If there's another spot open, I'll join.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Sept 19, 2007 22:04:26 GMT -5
Maybe allow 18 or 20 teams, it is alot, but should be fun and competitive.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Sept 19, 2007 22:12:05 GMT -5
Maybe allow 18 or 20 teams, it is alot, but should be fun and competitive. i miss spence, there has been a hole in my life for the past 3 days.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Sept 19, 2007 22:13:06 GMT -5
I miss him too. He's gotten funnier over the years.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Sept 19, 2007 22:23:41 GMT -5
It's at 16 teams already
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Sept 20, 2007 11:59:01 GMT -5
Are we gonna do a board draft? I think thatd be sweet.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Sept 20, 2007 12:02:14 GMT -5
I'm really against these restrictions on keepers.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Sept 20, 2007 12:03:18 GMT -5
I think we should just have 3-5 keepers at the end of each year. If its too complex people will lose interest. Keep it simple!
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Sept 20, 2007 12:03:50 GMT -5
I want Baron Davis, Stephen Jackson and Monta Ellis. I think thats fair.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Sept 20, 2007 12:05:20 GMT -5
I think we should just have 3-5 keepers at the end of each year. If its too complex people will lose interest. Keep it simple! Completely agree. If people want to keep youth and suck for now, then they should be able to. Martinez, you said that you've never been in a keeper league that doesn't have restrictions, but in general, they don't.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Sept 20, 2007 12:07:49 GMT -5
What is the problem, really?
The only restriction is that you can't have more than 2 players who have less than 3 seasons under their belt. You shouldn't be the one complaining as you are the one who does not understand why anyone would want to keep rookies anyways.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Sept 20, 2007 12:08:56 GMT -5
Its too complex for me. Youll have to help me decide who I can keep, and who I cant keep. K?
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Sept 20, 2007 12:10:04 GMT -5
What is the problem, really? The only restriction is that you can't have more than 2 players who have less than 3 seasons under their belt. You shouldn't be the one complaining as you are the one who does not understand why anyone would want to keep rookies anyways. When the hell did I say that?
|
|