|
Post by Spencer on Sept 3, 2007 15:33:27 GMT -5
Well you did mention it but i was confused as to when it was actually going to take effect. Hard cap is very punishing so maybe you should sticky it to remind people or something so we are up to date with that. Ill send out a Mass PM. I think its been pretty obvious that Ive been thinking of doing this for sometime though. I just dont think is a shock that Im lowering it.
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Sept 3, 2007 15:36:13 GMT -5
Im pretty sure we all knew it was coming. I think the confusion was more about when.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Sept 3, 2007 15:37:15 GMT -5
Ive wanted to change this for the last couple of years, and I always forget to give fair warning. I have no problem leaving it at 96 this up coming year, then having it go to 93 for the year after this coming year. I didn't see this while as I was typing my previous message. 1 season's notice is fair so I'll stay but it does upset me greatly when you change rules immediately much like the 48hr rule which you changed immediately which directly impacted me, which naturally makes me even more upset.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Sept 3, 2007 15:37:41 GMT -5
Ive wanted to change this for the last couple of years, and I always forget to give fair warning. I have no problem leaving it at 96 this up coming year, then having it go to 93 for the year after this coming year. I didn't see this while as I was typing my previous message. 1 season's notice is fair so I'll stay but it does upset me greatly when you change rules immediately much like the 48hr rule which you changed immediately which directly impacted me, which naturally makes me even more upset. you pussy, stand by your word.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Sept 3, 2007 15:37:54 GMT -5
my 2 cents, although it probably doesnt matter... there needs to be a hard cap. there needs to be a reward to winning. if you continue to win, you can have a higher hard cap than the rest of the league (sort of like going over the luxary tax) i think bbs has become too orineted on "evening the playing field" with rules like only one max in season extension per 3 years, which really is a disadvantage to teams that trade for really good picks (like my team). Parity is important for me. Dynasties kill leagues IMO. If there is no hope to compete with an elite team, or a few elite teams, the interest of the lower level teams is low. Hard Caps help this. Limiting MAX extensions help that. Its important to me that BBS lasts a long time, and rules like this I think make it more difficult to maintain a championship team.
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Sept 3, 2007 15:38:21 GMT -5
Hey krup i like your anger. How about we do a hot seat while your hott
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Sept 3, 2007 15:40:37 GMT -5
Ive wanted to change this for the last couple of years, and I always forget to give fair warning. I have no problem leaving it at 96 this up coming year, then having it go to 93 for the year after this coming year. I didn't see this while as I was typing my previous message. 1 season's notice is fair so I'll stay but it does upset me greatly when you change rules immediately much like the 48hr rule which you changed immediately which directly impacted me, which naturally makes me even more upset. Dave, I dont see how you can get so angry when you knew this had been in the works. I believe I didnt change it last year because you complained it was short notice. I just think you become oblivious to things when it doesn't benefit you to remember. regardless Im glad youre staying and hopefully youll be a little more understanding and patient with my decisions. As much as you say I treat you differently, in this case I made a decision based on things I had already said id do. When I realized I made a mistake i fixed it, and you still blew up and got angry.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Sept 3, 2007 15:42:30 GMT -5
wow, that threat to quit was about as empty as it gets.
|
|
|
Post by garf2000 on Oct 4, 2007 20:27:59 GMT -5
hard caps at 93 million now?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 4, 2007 20:33:03 GMT -5
Yep.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Oct 4, 2007 20:39:04 GMT -5
ooooooh
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Oct 4, 2007 20:45:28 GMT -5
yeah was about to ask about that
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 4, 2007 20:49:15 GMT -5
93!
|
|
|
Post by garf2000 on Oct 4, 2007 20:49:46 GMT -5
sooo 96? kid kid
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 4, 2007 20:50:01 GMT -5
lol, new thread.
|
|