|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 12:51:23 GMT -5
Post by KruPaxson on Apr 8, 2007 12:51:23 GMT -5
LeBron James SF 18 6'8'' 240 B B- C+ C+ C+ A LeBron James SF 18 6'8'' 240 B+ B C+ C+ C+ A Horrible not really
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 12:58:20 GMT -5
Post by ducky on Apr 8, 2007 12:58:20 GMT -5
LeBron James SF 18 6'8'' 240 B B- C+ C+ C+ A LeBron James SF 18 6'8'' 240 B+ B C+ C+ C+ A Horrible not really Yes it is, I want like B+ B B- B B- A + RC for getting all 5 right.
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 13:05:08 GMT -5
Post by KruPaxson on Apr 8, 2007 13:05:08 GMT -5
Lebron wasn't the best defender in his first year nor do I feel he is an excellent defender now. He poses a problem on defense because he usually has so much size over the guy he is playing but he isn't a great defender. Also Lebron's rookie year he wasn't great at shooting the 3 ball(which is what I would have used for his RC). He is going to be great and will be a total stat filler much like a Magic Johnson.
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 13:06:52 GMT -5
Post by ducky on Apr 8, 2007 13:06:52 GMT -5
Lebron wasn't the best defender in his first year nor do I feel he is an excellent defender now. He poses a problem on defense because he usually has so much size over the guy he is playing but he isn't a great defender. Also Lebron's rookie year he wasn't great at shooting the 3 ball(which is what I would have used for his RC). He is going to be great and will be a total stat filler much like a Magic Johnson. Well I already used my free upgrade on his 3 shot, but he needs defense now B+ B scoring in his first year is fine, but time to upgrade those C+s
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 13:13:57 GMT -5
Post by duce on Apr 8, 2007 13:13:57 GMT -5
i don't see the big deal. he's probly gonna get like 25-7-5(just because the nuggets suck right now) and only improve in the future.
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 13:25:57 GMT -5
Post by ducky on Apr 8, 2007 13:25:57 GMT -5
i don't see the big deal. he's probly gonna get like 25-7-5(just because the nuggets suck right now) and only improve in the future. lol, I know I'm just fooling. An 18 year old with B+ B C+ C+ C+ A ratings is sickey! Assuming that he still has like 85-95 potential, I could see A B+ B- A- B- C no doubt.
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 13:29:46 GMT -5
Post by KruPaxson on Apr 8, 2007 13:29:46 GMT -5
i don't see the big deal. he's probly gonna get like 25-7-5(just because the nuggets suck right now) and only improve in the future. lol, I know I'm just fooling. An 18 year old with B+ B C+ C+ C+ A ratings is sickey! Assuming that he still has like 85-95 potential, I could see A B+ B- A- B- C no doubt. whats ridiculous is lebron could be 6'10
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 14:34:15 GMT -5
Post by d2acollectables on Apr 8, 2007 14:34:15 GMT -5
i had tony parker go up again and remain at A potential pietrus up to B+ defense and jarvis and murphy both looking good from the outside
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 14:40:20 GMT -5
Post by KruPaxson on Apr 8, 2007 14:40:20 GMT -5
parker looks like another overrated pg
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 15:02:24 GMT -5
Post by NoColdFeet on Apr 8, 2007 15:02:24 GMT -5
Barbosa had a nice TC...
From C+ B- C+ C D+ A
to
Leandro Barbosa PG 20 6'3'' 176 C B+ B- B- C- A
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 15:05:25 GMT -5
Post by NoColdFeet on Apr 8, 2007 15:05:25 GMT -5
Smush Parker too...went from
C+ B- C+ B+ C- A to
Smush Parker PG 22 6'4'' 190 C+ B B- A- C B
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 15:13:07 GMT -5
Post by manasrai on Apr 8, 2007 15:13:07 GMT -5
Palacio went up inside, outside, and in D Now: C+ B- B- B C
Watson went up in outside and D
Now: C B B- B+ D+
Barbosa went up in handles, and up 2 times in both outside and D. He went down in inside though. Now: C B+ B- B- C-
Parker went up in outside, handles, D, and rebounding Now: C+ B B- A- C
ANYONE NEED A PG??
Jefferson went down in inside scoring, but up in handles and D Now: C+ B B- A C
Wallace went up in inside, outside, handles, and D Now: B C C- A- C
Harrington went up in inside, but down in outside Now: A- C+ C B+ C+
Thats about all the relevant stuff that happened. By and large a very strong TC I must say. Some further thoughts:
Harrington's path of improvement makes me want to try him out at PF, even though he was on an all league team as a SF last season.
Barbosa was huge, making it clear why Spencer thought he could be a starter from day one...on the right team. Him dropping in inside scoring really was a bummer though.
If Smush goes up to B handles from the RC we just used on him I think he may be ready to be a pretty damn solid starting PG. Regardless I'm pretty confident in Smush's ability to continue to grow into a good starter eventually.
It's funny how Wallace had a great TC, but continues to look average. I think he's gonna end up being an all league caliber defender, but probably not much more.
RJ going down in inside upsets me because I've previously used RC's to increase that rating. All the same he's still a solid scorer with nice handles for a SG and one hell of a defender.
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 16:28:06 GMT -5
Post by Outlawz on Apr 8, 2007 16:28:06 GMT -5
Great TC for us all around.
Yao Ming C 22 7'5'' 299 B C C- B+ B+ B - Went up in defense and went from B- to B+ in rebounding.
Chris Kaman C 21 7'0'' 268 B C- D+ B+ B- A - Wow. Im glad i made this pick. Went up in inside, 2 grades in defense, and potential
Reggie Evans PF 23 6'8'' 247 C D+ D B- A- C - Defense went up. Good backup
Keith Van Horn SF 28 6'10'' 246 A- B- D+ B+ C+ C - Where did that come from? inside and defense went up.
[Kirk Hinrich PG 22 6'3'' 190 C B+ A- B- C- A - Outside, handles, and D all went up. Very pleased. Just gotta work on that D.
As for the rest K-Mart stayed the same, allen stayed the same, Wesley stayed the same, gadzuric went down, Zarko went up in defense, and Koponos outside shot went up.
|
|
shaunkol
Scrub
Sonics Assistant GM
Posts: 14
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 16:34:35 GMT -5
Post by shaunkol on Apr 8, 2007 16:34:35 GMT -5
damn really nice tc for sonics
really like JJ and Jones
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 16:36:43 GMT -5
Post by aaronjh on Apr 8, 2007 16:36:43 GMT -5
Great TC for us all around. Yao Ming C 22 7'5'' 299 B C C- B+ B+ B - Went up in defense and went from B- to B+ in rebounding. Chris Kaman C 21 7'0'' 268 B C- D+ B+ B- A - Wow. Im glad i made this pick. Went up in inside, 2 grades in defense, and potential Reggie Evans PF 23 6'8'' 247 C D+ D B- A- C - Defense went up. Good backup Keith Van Horn SF 28 6'10'' 246 A- B- D+ B+ C+ C - Where did that come from? inside and defense went up. [Kirk Hinrich PG 22 6'3'' 190 C B+ A- B- C- A - Outside, handles, and D all went up. Very pleased. Just gotta work on that D. As for the rest K-Mart stayed the same, allen stayed the same, Wesley stayed the same, gadzuric went down, Zarko went up in defense, and Koponos outside shot went up. I'm jealous.
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 16:39:46 GMT -5
Post by Spencer on Apr 8, 2007 16:39:46 GMT -5
Allen went up B- inside to B.
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 16:59:22 GMT -5
Post by Outlawz on Apr 8, 2007 16:59:22 GMT -5
Allen went up B- inside to B. Shit your right. lol Even better.. Woo
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 17:14:17 GMT -5
Post by manasrai on Apr 8, 2007 17:14:17 GMT -5
Spencer when do you plan on doing a preseason?
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 17:18:51 GMT -5
Post by Spencer on Apr 8, 2007 17:18:51 GMT -5
Spencer when do you plan on doing a preseason? After RCs are done.
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 17:19:32 GMT -5
Post by Spencer on Apr 8, 2007 17:19:32 GMT -5
We also need teams to fix trades and fill up rosters still.
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 17:58:50 GMT -5
Post by garf2000 on Apr 8, 2007 17:58:50 GMT -5
Don't entirely remember what the ratings were before, but Amare is now A- D+ D+ B B B, and Diaw is B B B- B+ C+A
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 18:20:17 GMT -5
Post by duce on Apr 8, 2007 18:20:17 GMT -5
Don't entirely remember what the ratings were before, but Amare is now A- D+ D+ B B B, and Diaw is B B B- B+ C+A Amare was B D+ D+ B- B A very nice improvement... though i would have wanted more rebounding and been disappointed because i'm a whore for rebounding. he'll compliment your backcourt very nicely though... lakers the team to beat.
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 19:50:58 GMT -5
Post by manasrai on Apr 8, 2007 19:50:58 GMT -5
Diaw looks really nice
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 20:45:14 GMT -5
Post by aigatdula on Apr 8, 2007 20:45:14 GMT -5
yup, coz we had that hole @ the PG spot and LO was well to fill the hole pretty nicely, IMO.. LO has been at PG since the end of last year.
|
|
|
TC
Apr 8, 2007 20:48:30 GMT -5
Post by manasrai on Apr 8, 2007 20:48:30 GMT -5
The Rockets are a very good looking team now...they're my favorites to lead the league in rebounding this season.
|
|