|
Post by KruPaxson on Sept 23, 2007 22:37:07 GMT -5
thankfully Garnett has never been a winner
|
|
|
Post by GP on Sept 23, 2007 22:45:42 GMT -5
nice deal for both but you gotta love the Knicks depth.
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Sept 23, 2007 22:50:52 GMT -5
thankfully Garnett has never been a winner Neither was Dirk.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Sept 23, 2007 22:52:21 GMT -5
he was winner enough to beat detroit and philly back in the day.
still a choker tho ya.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Sept 23, 2007 23:52:50 GMT -5
thankfully Garnett has never been a winner Neither was Dirk. I was referring to BBS...KG has never been a winner.
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Sept 23, 2007 23:57:57 GMT -5
Neither was Dirk. I was referring to BBS...KG has never been a winner. So was i. Dirk didn't win anything in Philly. It's more about the makeup of a team. I dont think there's a "winner/loser" factor in FBB
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Sept 24, 2007 0:02:34 GMT -5
I was referring to BBS...KG has never been a winner. So was i. Dirk didn't win anything in Philly. It's more about the makeup of a team. I dont think there's a "winner/loser" factor in FBB key word being "never" a winner and Dirk has been. Dirk led the sixers to two years of + 60 win seasons an accomplishment that has only been accomplished by a few franchises. Dirk has a ring and KG doesn't period.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Sept 24, 2007 0:08:37 GMT -5
wow man.
these are not real people.
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Sept 24, 2007 0:12:28 GMT -5
wow man. these are not real people. really?
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Sept 24, 2007 0:17:18 GMT -5
So was i. Dirk didn't win anything in Philly. It's more about the makeup of a team. I dont think there's a "winner/loser" factor in FBB key word being "never" a winner and Dirk has been. Dirk led the sixers to two years of + 60 win seasons an accomplishment that has only been accomplished by a few franchises. Dirk has a ring and KG doesn't period. He's never had that kind of talent around him. He had Duncan on the Pacers but that team always lacked depth and i believe they did real well during the season so im not sure what your saying here. I understand that he hasn't won a ring but i dont think you label anyone a loser just based on that. You can call Dirk a choker then. Philly always had great teams and lost. You've been upset a couple of times including a 1st round loss sooo wateva
|
|
|
Post by KruPaxson on Sept 24, 2007 1:52:06 GMT -5
key word being "never" a winner and Dirk has been. Dirk led the sixers to two years of + 60 win seasons an accomplishment that has only been accomplished by a few franchises. Dirk has a ring and KG doesn't period. He's never had that kind of talent around him. He had Duncan on the Pacers but that team always lacked depth and i believe they did real well during the season so im not sure what your saying here. I understand that he hasn't won a ring but i dont think you label anyone a loser just based on that. You can call Dirk a choker then. Philly always had great teams and lost. You've been upset a couple of times including a 1st round loss sooo wateva We'll see Duncan and Hill weren't that bad of surrounding talent
|
|
KG
Starter
Timberwolves
Posts: 1,204
|
Post by KG on Sept 24, 2007 5:41:37 GMT -5
Eish.
|
|
|
Post by duce on Sept 24, 2007 10:11:19 GMT -5
i mean, have you gone absolutely insane?
this is NOT real.
not real.
get it?
got that?
good then.
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Sept 24, 2007 10:44:04 GMT -5
superman that ho
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Sept 24, 2007 11:56:48 GMT -5
trade in
|
|