|
Post by Adelaide on May 15, 2007 23:29:06 GMT -5
*This is a very confusing deal in multiple parts the main one is the first though so it does not really matter too much about the deals after.
Before the deal
Mavs cut Planinic, McInnis, Sweets and Garnett
Mavs have 11 players now Sonics 15
DEAL 1
Mavs Send
Tony Battie Jerome Moiso Sonics send
Nene Jackson Mo Taylor Dahantay Jones
Mavs have 13 players Sonics have 13 players
Tricky part is now
Sonics Sign Two VET FA's
Part 2 of the Deal
Sonics Send TWO Vet FA's and Ariza
Mavs Send Mo Taylor
Sonics have 11 players Mavs Have 15 players
MAVS THEN CUT THE TWO FA's SENT TO THEM FROM SEATTLE
MAVS HAVE 13 PLAYERS SONICS HAVE 11
DEAL 3
SONICS SIGN TWO MORE VET FA's
SONICS SEND
TWO VET FA's to DALLAS
DALLAS SENDS
Trevor Ariza.
So in the end
Dallas sends
Battie Moiso
Seattle sends
B Jax Nene Jones
Reasons to come shit that was hard
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on May 15, 2007 23:31:47 GMT -5
Dallas agrees, I was talking to about 5 different guys at once involving deals and should have held off on that Phx deal till we had this ironed out.
My apologies to Pig.
Thx and GL to the Sonics
|
|
|
Post by duce on May 15, 2007 23:39:45 GMT -5
come on man, school's over for me, i don't need any more of this shit to figure out. veto.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on May 15, 2007 23:42:00 GMT -5
I did overpay here but I'm not upset, Jones has had sick TC's and is looking really good, but he has no birds I cant resign him, I think Ariza holds down the backup 3 nicely so might as well try and get a solid rebounder at the 4 with Moiso and a solid big man at the 5 with battie. Jackson wont get any minutes for me so I m not too upset with that even though I might of been able to get something better with him.
I m loving the lineup of Brandon-Iverson-Richardson-Taylor-Battie I think we have one hell of a juggernaut offense with that in there and Ridnour-Grizzard-Ariza-Moiso is decent off the bench
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on May 16, 2007 0:30:15 GMT -5
Word.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 16, 2007 0:42:10 GMT -5
This trade is gonna take like 4 sims, lol.
|
|
|
Post by aigatdula on May 16, 2007 1:33:01 GMT -5
did we vote for how many FAs can be used in a deal?? im too confused to count at this time..
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on May 16, 2007 1:47:06 GMT -5
Should be 3 sims of 5 days if I am correct?
|
|
|
Post by JDawg on May 16, 2007 9:20:55 GMT -5
1 thing in the trade, instead of cutting sweetney cut ellis, thanks. and after all trades are done cut a VET FA and re-sign Chris Garnet, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on May 16, 2007 11:22:40 GMT -5
garnett would have to pass through waivers
|
|
|
Post by JDawg on May 16, 2007 11:28:48 GMT -5
garnett would have to pass through waivers alrite. but we definitely want ellis cut instead of sweetney.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 16, 2007 11:33:40 GMT -5
1st trade in
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on May 16, 2007 12:16:19 GMT -5
5) Players cannot be traded back and forth in the same trade. A trade back of players must wait 4 sims.
8) No more then 3 VET FAs can be signed for the purpose of trading.
I for one count 4 Vet FA's signed for the purpose of trading.
|
|
|
Post by aaron2344 on May 16, 2007 12:34:14 GMT -5
he's definitely the guy who told on everyone in school, haha
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on May 16, 2007 12:37:52 GMT -5
Who's traded back and forth? It's seperate deals just posted in one topic for ease. Thats 3 signed per team right which isnt gone over in any deal no?
|
|
|
Post by JDawg on May 16, 2007 12:38:20 GMT -5
he's definitely the guy who told on everyone in school, haha lmao
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on May 16, 2007 12:44:46 GMT -5
he's definitely the guy who told on everyone in school, haha Thats ok, Greggor holds grudges. I'll remember this.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on May 16, 2007 13:00:54 GMT -5
School? no we were not competing for grades. Here when its 29 teams for themselves? Of course I point out rule violations.
This is one big trade, Ariza was traded back and forth, It doesn't say 3 per team it says 3 players signed for the purpose of trading....there are 4 here. Didn't we have a 2 week long debate with polls and everything that decided this? This kind of trade was the whole reason behind it.
Hold grudges all you want we made the rules for a reason. As evidence of BOTH the polls more agree with me than don't agree.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on May 16, 2007 13:40:53 GMT -5
School? no we were not competing for grades. Here when its 29 teams for themselves? Of course I point out rule violations. This is one big trade, Ariza was traded back and forth, It doesn't say 3 per team it says 3 players signed for the purpose of trading....there are 4 here. Didn't we have a 2 week long debate with polls and everything that decided this? This kind of trade was the whole reason behind it. Hold grudges all you want we made the rules for a reason. As evidence of BOTH the polls more agree with me than don't agree. If this is that big of a deal I will just post these deals 24 hours from each other.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on May 16, 2007 13:47:57 GMT -5
lol....Ariza for 2 vet FA's ?
VETO!!
|
|
|
Post by duce on May 16, 2007 13:48:24 GMT -5
lol j/k i'd do the same thing if either of those teams had impact on my own team.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on May 16, 2007 13:50:00 GMT -5
The integrity of the league is very important to me...lol
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on May 16, 2007 14:05:22 GMT -5
lol j/k i'd do the same thing if either of those teams had impact on my own team. Kinda Ironic the stop sign is from Seattle.
|
|
|
Post by duce on May 16, 2007 14:05:59 GMT -5
hahahahaha, did not even see that.
|
|
|
Post by Adelaide on May 16, 2007 14:07:40 GMT -5
The integrity of the league is very important to me...lol You bring up an interesting point in a deal like this and that is how long until you can trade a player back to a team. If I wasn't so damn lazy I would just separate the deal into different parts every 24 hours and get all the players at the same time as a mega deal with all the deals involved in one post.
|
|